Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:12:09.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOWARDS A DESIGN OBSERVATORY: THE CASE OF SCHOLARLY DESIGN RESEARCH IN PORTUGAL

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

N. Costa ,
V. Branco ,
R. Costa ,
A. Borges ,
A. Modesto ,
C. Silva  and
R. Cunca
N. Costa*
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Portugal
V. Branco
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Portugal
R. Costa
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Portugal
A. Borges
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Portugal University of Beira Interior, Portugal
A. Modesto
Affiliation:
University of Porto, Portugal
C. Silva
Affiliation:
Polytechnic Institute of Cavado e do Ave, Portugal
R. Cunca
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
*
*ndc@ua.pt

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The DesignOBS project was created to collect, map and interpret data about the Portuguese Design Ecosystem, providing supportive information for decision making. This study takes advantage of a participative Design perspective to define and test an observation process via a case based on Design doctorates undertaken in Portugal. It emphasises the need for additional participatory analysis and curation by experts to evaluate and develop more reliable information about the discipline. Moreover, it develops recommendations that can enhance the communicability of Design doctorates.

Keywords

designdesign researchdesign doctoratesdesign educationdesign guidelines
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 827 - 836
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Agapito, D. et al. (2015), O perfil do designer e o papel do design nas empresas em Portugal. Retrieved from http://www.and.org.pt/files/design_portugal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mateus, Augusto & Associados. (2016), A economia criativa em Portugal: Relevância para a competitividade e internacionalização da economia portuguesa. 58. http://clubecriativos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ADDICT_Economia-Criativa_vf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Borges, A. et al. (2018), REDE#01: Reunião de Escolas de Design. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10773/24199Google Scholar
Branco, V. et al. (2019), Towards a portuguese design observatory: models, instruments, representation and strategies. Retrieved November 7, 2019, from http://designobs.pt/Google Scholar
Branco, V. and Providência, F. (2018), “Design as cultural mediation between matter and what matters”, The Design Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1396025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2001), “Design research and the new learning”, Design Issues, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ministros, Conselho. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.o 25/2018 - Linhas orientadoras para uma estratégia de inovação tecnológica e empresarial para Portugal, 2018 -2030. Diário Da República, Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 1204–1206.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2007), “Forty years of design research”, Design Studies, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curado, R. (2013), Centro Português de Design vai ser extinto. Retrieved from Diário de Notícias website: https://www.dn.pt/artes/centro-portugues-de-Design-vai-ser-extinto-3248523.html (access on 01/01/2020)Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2008), “Why do we need doctoral study in design”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 71–79. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/481/223Google Scholar
Díaz-Méndez, M., Saren, M. and Gummesson, E. (2017), “Considering pollution in the higher education (HE) service ecosystem”, The TQM Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-03-2017-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K. (2016), “Design practice and design research: finally together?”, DRS2016: Future-Focused Thinking, Vol. 7, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.212Google Scholar
European Commission. (2013), Implementing an Action Plan for Design-Driven Innovation, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/design/design-swd-2013-380_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Félix, M.J.L.G. (2013), Contributos Para Uma Visão Estratégica Da Investigação Na Área Do Design Em Portugal (Tese de doutoramento). Faculdade de arquitetura da universidade técnica de Lisboa. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/12275Google Scholar
Forlizzi, J. et al. (2009), “From Design Research to Theory: Evidence of a Maturing Field”, International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference.Google Scholar
Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J. and Evenson, S. (2008), “Crafting a place for interaction design research in HCI”, Design Issues, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayling, C. (1993), “Research in Art and Design”, Royal College of Art Research Papers, Vol. 1, pp. 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.opengrey.eu/handle/10068/492065Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S.E. (2005), “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis”, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15 No. 9, pp. 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, P. (2017), “From Design Methods to Future-Focused Thinking: 50 years of design research”, Design Studies, Vol. 48, pp. A1–A8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, E. (2015), “Design When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation”. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whicher, A., Cawood, G. and Walters, A. (2012), “Research and Practice in Design and Innovation Policy in Europe”, Leading Innovation through Design. International Design Management Research Conference, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Whicher, A., Swiatek, P. and Ward, J. (2018), Design4Innovation Policy Booklet 1: Mapping Design Ecosystems. (consulted in 2019, November) Retrieved from https://www.interregeurope.eu/design4innovation/library/#folder=923Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2014), Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). California, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Saavedra, C.C., Villodres, T.S. and Lindemann, U. (2017), “Review and Classification of Knowledge in Engineering Design”, In Chakrabarti, A. and Chakrabati, D. (Eds.), Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2: Proceedings of ICoRD, Singapore, Springer, pp. 617-628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983), The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
KPMG (2016), Better Data, Better Government, retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/co-gv-6-better-data,-better-government.pdf (accessed 23/01/2020)Google Scholar