Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:05:54.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

Y. Mitake ,
K. Hiramitsu ,
A. Nagayama ,
N. Muraoka ,
M. Sholihah  and
Y. Shimomura
Y. Mitake*
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
K. Hiramitsu
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
A. Nagayama
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
N. Muraoka
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
M. Sholihah
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
Y. Shimomura
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
*
*mitake-yuya@ed.tmu.ac.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Product-service systems (PSSs) are regarded as one of the promising ways to contribute to a sustainable society. Despite the well-developed knowledge, PSS design lack of long-term perspective to treat related changes and uncertainties. To address this issue, this paper proposes a conceptual framework of sustainable PSS design for sustainability transition by integrating insight from design approach for system innovation and transition. Applicability of the proposed framework is illustrated through application to example of PSS development project for wildlife nuisance in a suburban city.

Keywords

sustainabilitysustainable designproduct-service systems (PSS)social innovation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2069 - 2078
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Allais, R. and Gobert, J. (2019), “Conceptual framework for spatio-temporal analysis of territorial projects”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 77 No. April, pp. 93–104, pp. 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriankaja, H., Boucher, X. and Medini, K. (2018), “A method to design integrated product-service systems based on the extended functional analysis approach”, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, CIRP, Vol. 21, pp. 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annarelli, A., Battistella, C. and Nonino, F. (2016), “Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 139, pp. 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurich, J.C., Fuchs, C. and Wagenknecht, C. (2006), “Life cycle oriented design of technical Product-Service Systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 17, pp. 1480–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, T. et al. (2017), “Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, T.S. et al. (2007), “State-of-the-art in product-service systems”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 221 No. 10, pp. 1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambila-Macias, S.A., Sakao, T. and Kowalkowski, C. (2018), “Bridging the gap between engineering design and marketing: insights for research and practice in product/service system design”, Design Science, Vol. 4, pp. e7. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo-Contreras, R. et al. (2018), “Urban wild boars prefer fragmented areas with food resources near natural corridors”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 615, pp. 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalieri, S. and Pezzotta, G. (2012), “Product-service systems engineering: State of the art and research challenges”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F. (2013), “Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-Service systems: Insights from innovation studies and companies’ experiences”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 45, pp. 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F. (2014), “How the design of socio-technical experiments can enable radical changes for sustainability”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001), “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science”, Design Issues, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficetola, G.F. et al. (2014), “Predicting wild boar damages to croplands in a mosaic of agricultural and natural areas”, Current Zoology, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/60.2.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.I. and Brezet, H. (2015), “Design for system innovations and transitions: A conceptual framework integrating insights from sustainablity science and theories of system innovations and transitions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, pp. 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.I. and Ryan, C. (2017), “Roles of design in sustainability transitions projects: A case study of Visions and Pathways 2040 project from Australia”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 162, pp. 1297–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.I., Boyle, C. and McDowall, R. (2013), “System innovation for sustainability: A systemic double-flow scenario method for companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 45, pp. 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.I. and Öztekin, E.E. (2019), “Design for sustainability transitions: Origins, attitudes and future directions”, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 11, p. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133601Google Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2004), “From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory”, Research Policy, Vol. 33 No. 6-7, pp. 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2011), “The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevner, M. and Ram, P.a. (2004), “Design Science in Information Systems Research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, p. 75. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyysalo, S. et al. (2019), “Codesign for transitions governance: A Mid-range pathway creation toolset for accelerating sociotechnical change”, Design Studies, Vol. 63, pp. 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joore, P. and Brezet, H. (2015), “A Multilevel Design Model: The mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 97, pp. 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledford, H. (2015), “How to solve the world's biggest problems”, Nature, Vol. 525, pp. 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1038/525308aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liedtke, C. et al. (2015), “User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 97, pp. 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D. (2010), “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework”, Governance, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mont, O. (2002), “Clarifying the concept of product–service system”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, N. (2003), “Product-service systems, a perspective shift for designers: A case study - The design of a telecentre”, Design Studies, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00029-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, N. (2006), “Developing new product service systems (PSS): methodologies and operational tools”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 17, pp. 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzotta, G. et al. (2016), “Towards a methodology to engineer industrial product-service system – Evidence from power and automation industry”, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 15, pp. 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakao, T. and Shimomura, Y. (2007), “Service Engineering: a novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A.J. and Raven, R. (2019), “Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 145, pp. 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimomura, Y., Hara, T. and Arai, T. (2009), “A unified representation scheme for effective PSS development”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sondeijker, S. et al. (2006), “Imagining sustainability: The added value of transition scenarios in transition management”, Foresight, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680610703063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, T.A. and Park, J.Y. (2014), “Development of integrated design methodology for various types of product — service systems”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.7315/JCDE.2014.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasantha, G. et al. (2012), “A review of product-service systems design methodologies”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 9, pp. 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.639712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezzoli, C., Ceschin, F. and Kemp, R. (2008), “Designing transition paths for the diffusion of sustainable system innovations”, Proceedings of Changing the Change - an International Conference on the Role and Potential of Design Research in the Transition towards Sustainability, Turin, Italy, July 10–12, 2008, Allemandi, Turin, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Vezzoli, C. et al. (2016), “New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product-Service Systems’”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 97, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar