Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T06:01:44.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ARE ECO-DESIGN STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED IN PRODUCTS? A STUDY ON THE AGREEMENT LEVEL OF INDEPENDENT OBSERVERS

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

L. Maccioni ,
Y. Borgianni ,
D. C. A. Pigosso  and
T. C. McAloone
L. Maccioni*
Affiliation:
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
Y. Borgianni
Affiliation:
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
D. C. A. Pigosso
Affiliation:
DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
T. C. McAloone
Affiliation:
DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
*
*lorenzo.maccioni@unibz.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Eco-Design Strategies lead to both enhanced environmental sustainability and product differentiation, which, however, takes place only if observers recognize and value these advantages. To study this aspect, a sample of 40 product pictures has been administered to 12 subjects with experience in eco-design. They were asked to evaluate whether one or more Eco-Design Strategies (in Vezzoli and Manzini's version) were implemented in each depicted product. The outcome of the evaluation was an overall fair agreement. Useful information for eco-design is inferred from nuances of the results.

Keywords

sustainable designproduct designdesign evaluationecodesign strategies
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2039 - 2048
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bocken, N.M. et al. (2016), “Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy”, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgianni, Y., Maccioni, L. and Pigosso, D. (2019), “Environmental Lifecycle Hotspots and the Implementation of Eco-design Principles: Does Consistency Pay off?”, International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, Springer, Singapore, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9271-9_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascini, G. (2012), “TRIZ-based anticipatory design of future products and processes”, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 29–63. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2012-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J. and Clarkson, P.J. (2004), “Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design”, Design Studies, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSimone, L.D. and Popoff, F. (2000), Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development, MIT press.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J.L. (1971), “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters”, Psychological bulletin, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussler, C. and James, P. (1996), Eco-innovation: a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.D. and Kasravi, K. (2012), “Predicting the Future of IT Services with TRIZ”, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2012-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977), “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data”, Biometrics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006), “EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 15-16, pp. 1396–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y. and Pigosso, D.C. (2019a), “Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?”, Design Science, Vol. 5, p. e25. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y. and Basso, D. (2019b), “Value Perception of Green Products: An Exploratory Study Combining Conscious Answers and Unconscious Behavioral Aspects”, Sustainability, Vol. 11, p. 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, M.L. (2012), “Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic”, Biochemia medica, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 276–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, M. et al. (2016), “A conceptual framework for circular design”, Sustainability, Vol. 8 No. 9, p. 937, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. and Brockhaus, S. (2017), “Dancing in the dark: Challenges for product developers to improve and communicate product sustainability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 161, pp. 345–354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigosso, D.C., Rozenfeld, H. and McAloone, T.C. (2013), “Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 59, pp. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segev, S., Fernandes, J. and Hong, C. (2016), “Is your product really green? A content analysis to reassess green advertising”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1083918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, J. and MacDonald, E. (2013), “Trigger features on prototypes increase preference for sustainability”, In ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. p. V005T06A043-V005T06A043.Google Scholar
She, J. and MacDonald, E. (2014), “Priming designers to communicate sustainability”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 136 No. 1, p. 011001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, J. and MacDonald, E. (2018), “Exploring the Effects of a Product's Sustainability Triggers on Pro-environmental Decision-making”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 1, p. 011102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, J. et al. (2018), “Priming Designers Leads to Prime Designs”, In Design Thinking Research. Springer, Cham, pp. 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hemel, C.G. (1999), EcoDesign empirically explored: Design for environment in Dutch small and medium-sized enterprises, [PhD thesis], Technical University of Delft.Google Scholar
Vezzoli, C. and Manzini, E. (2008), Design for environmental sustainability, Springer, London.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S. et al. (2016), “Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation”, Design Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar