Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T19:49:43.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selecting terminal beef sires on their estimated breeding values for economic efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

Margaret E King
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, 581 King Street, Aberdeen, AB9 1UD
P J Broadbent
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, 581 King Street, Aberdeen, AB9 1UD
Get access

Extract

The selection objective of the SAC Simmental MOET Project, is to improve the economic efficiency of lean, or saleable, meat production in crossbred beef production systems.

The factors which contribute to the selection objective are the yield of saleable meat, feed intake and calving difficulty. These goal characteristics are combined into an index by taking into account their respective financial values and costs. Calves generated by multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) are weaned from their recipient dams at 10 weeks old and placed in performance test from 5 to 11 months of age. At the end of the performance test, saleable meat yield is estimated from liveweight at end of test, ultrasonic fat depth measurements and muscling score. Calving difficulty is predicted from the birthweight and gestation length of the animal on test whilst feed intake is measured directly by recording individual food intakes during performance testing. The estimated breeding value for the selection index of an animal is expressed in £'s (pounds sterling) as deviations from a mean of zero for the SAC population of Simmentals. It is calculated using the information for each animal plus that of all its relatives in its own and other performance tests by means of BLUP procedures.

The objective of the work described here was to evaluate the effectiveness of the selection index in identifying sires of superior genetic merit for use in crossbred beef production systems.

Type
Genetics & Cattle Improvement
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)