Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:14:01.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutrient digestibility of alfalfa at different growth stages on sheep and goat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

M. M. Moeini
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
M. Souri
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
F. Hozabri
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
M. R. Sanjabi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, IROST, Tehran, Iran
Get access

Extract

The nutritive values of animal feed are dependents on plant species, stages of maturity, harvesting and preparation methods. Legumes provide maximum yield, high forage quality (protein, mineral and digestible energy). Legumes decrease in protein and digestible dry matter and increase in fibre as they increase in growth or in maturity (Hochensmith et al., 1997). Alfalfa (medica sativa) is world unique forage in livestock food. This study was conducted to examine the chemical composition and nutrient digestibility of Hamadanian alfalfa forage at different growth stage on two local Iranian sheep and goat breeds.

Type
Sheep Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hochensmith, R. L, Sheaffer, C. C., Marten, G., and Holgerson, j. L. 1997. Maturation effects on forage quality. Can. jou. Plant. Science 77: 7580.Google Scholar
Tabatabai, A., Saki, H., Arabi, F. and Hozabri, F. 1999. Chemical composition and nutrient digestibility of Hamadanian alfalfa at different growth stage. Iranian Journal of Buali Sina university, Vol 1: 5867.Google Scholar
Martin, N. P, 2001. Forage quality for optimum growth and production. Proceeding of Manitoba Dairy/Forage/Beef opportunities conference, pp 7784.Google Scholar