Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T11:06:09.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A low tech in vitro procedure using faecal liquor for the estimation of digestibility of Forages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

H.M. Omed
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural & Forest sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
A. Faza
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural & Forest sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
R.F.E. Axford
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural & Forest sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
I. Ap Dewi
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural & Forest sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
D.I. Givens
Affiliation:
ADAS Feed Evaluation & Nutritional Sciences, Stratford upon Avon, CV37 9RQ
Get access

Extract

Two-stage techniques Tilley & Terry (1963) for the estimation of digestibility have 3 main disadvantages for use in developing countries with limited laboratory facilities. Carbon dioxide is needed to saturate the buffers; a centrifuge is necessary to separate residues from solubilised materials; and the methods uses pepsin as a proteolytic agent. The aim of the present study was to eliminate these three requirements for the faecal liquor method ( Omed et al., 1989), by replacing bicarbonate with phosphate buffer (Marten & Barnes, 1980), pepsin with biological washing liquid, and centrifugation with sedimentation.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Marten, G.C. and Barnes, R.F. (1980). Prediction of energy digestibility of forages. In Standarization of analytical methodology for feeds. Eds. Pigden, W. & Graham, M., International development centre, Ottawa, Canada Google Scholar
Omed, H.M., Axford, R.F.E., Chamberlain, A.G. & Givens, D.I. (1989). a comparison of three laboratory techniques for the estimation of the digestibility of feedstuffs for ruminants. Journal of agricultural Science 13, 3539.10.1017/S0021859600084586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J.M. and Terry, R.A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society, 18, 104111.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar