Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T22:44:06.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the eating quality of pork

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

M.J. Van Oeckel
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre - Ghent, Department Animal Nutrition and husbandry, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
N. Warnants
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre - Ghent, Department Animal Nutrition and husbandry, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Ch.V. Boucqué
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre - Ghent, Department Animal Nutrition and husbandry, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Get access

Extract

A Belgian study shows that the five most important meat attributes for the consumers are as follows: quality, taste, freshness, absence of hormones and healthiness (Verbeke and Viaene, 1999). This corroborates with the results of a French survey by Touraille (1992), who found that sensory properties and security aspects (hormones) of meat are of paramount importance for the consumer. It is important to direct pork production towards an acceptable product adapted to the consumer's demand. The objective of this study is to evaluate in which way and how strong the sensory quality parameters are influenced by different factors.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Touraille, C. 1992. Consumer evaluation of meat quality criteria. Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 23-28 August, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 301304.Google Scholar
Verbeke, W., Viaene, J., 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference 10: 437445.Google Scholar