Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:38:49.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equine stereotypies: Current theories and future directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

M Parker*
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Spontaneous stereotypic behaviour is conceptualised as topographically invariant, repetitive, rigid behaviour patterns, typically thought to be an artefact of captivity (Mason and Rushen 2006). In horses, stereotypic behaviours are commonly reported, probably owing to the high numbers of domesticated animals maintained under restrictive conditions (Parker et al., 2008a; Waters et al. 2002). Spontaneous stereotypies displayed by the horse include both oral (e.g., cribbing/windsucking) and locomotor (e.g., weaving and box-walking). There are a variety of extant theories as to what causes these behaviours, ranging from boredom to genetic predisposition and everywhere in-between. Affecting up to 35% of domestic horses in the UK, stereotypies represent a significant challenge for owners and a clear understanding of their aetiology is important in order to move to reduce the incidence. Recent advances in our understanding of the behavioural and neurobiological processes involved in the development and maintenance of drug-induced stereotypies in laboratory animals may provide us with a useful model for a better understanding of the spontaneous equivalent.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cabib, S. & Bonaventura, N. (1997). Parallel strain-dependent susceptibility to environmentally-induced stereotypies and stress-induced behavioral sensitization in mice. Physiology & Behavior, 61, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, G. J. & Rushen, J. Eds. (2006). Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. Oxford: CABI Google Scholar
McBride, S. D. & Hemmings, A. (2005). Altered mesoaccumbens and nigro-striatal dopamine physiology is associated with stereotypy development in a non-rodent species. Behavioural Brain Research, 159, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M., Goodwin, D., & Redhead, E. S. (2008). Survey of breeders’ management of horses in Europe, North America and Australia: comparison of factors associated with the development of abnormal behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M., Redhead, E. S., Goodwin, D., & McBride, S. D. (2008). Impaired instrumental choice in crib-biting horses (Equus caballus). Behavioural Brain Research, 191, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M., McBride, S. D., Redhead, E. S., & Goodwin, D. In press. Differential place and response learning in horses displaying an oral stereotypy. Behavioural Brain Research.Google Scholar
Waters, A. J., Nicol, C. J., & French, N. P. (2002). Factors influencing the development of stereotypic and redirected behaviours in young horses: findings of a four year prospective epidemiological study. Equine Veterinary Journal, 34, 572–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed