Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T19:34:56.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of microbial phytase on apparent digestibility of amino acids and minerals in diet of female broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

A. Hassanabadi*
Affiliation:
Dept of Animal Science, faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
H. Nassiri Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Dept of Animal Science, faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
H. Kermanshahi
Affiliation:
Dept of Animal Science, faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
Get access

Extract

Phytic acid is the main storage form of P in grains and seeds. Cereals and grain legumes that are commonly used as poultry feed ingredients have similar phytate levels, approximating 0.25 percent of dry matter (Ravindran et al., 1995). There is not enough phytase activity in the digestive tract of chickens to digest phytate (Maenz and Classen, 1998). Phytate contributes to environmental pollution by reducing mineral and N bioavailability. The capacity of phytic acid to bind minerals reduces the utilization of P, Ca, Zn, Fe and N from plant ingredients by chickens (Sell et al., 2000). Phytate may form complexes with proteases, such as trypsin and pepsin in the gastrointestinal tract (Singh and Kricorian, 1982). These complexes may reduce the activity of digestive enzymes with a subsequent decrease in the digestibility of dietary proteins. It has been reported that microbial phytase improves the utilization of amino acids (Ravindran et al., 1999) and minerals in broiler chicks. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of microbial phytase on the apparent digestibility of amino acids (AA) and some minerals in the diet of female broiler chickens.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheryan, M. 1980. Phytic acid interactions in food systems. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 13: 297–335.Google Scholar
Maenz, D. D. and Classen, H. L. 1998. Phytase activity in the small intestinal brush border membrane of the chicken. Poultry Science 77: 557–563.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Bryden, W. L. and Kornegay, E. T. 1995. Phytates: occurrence, bioavailability and implications in poultry nutrition. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 6: 125–143.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Cabahug, S., Ravindran, G. and Bryden, W. L. 1999. Influence of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in feedstuffs for broilers. Poultry Science 78: 699–706.Google Scholar
Selle, P. H., Ravindran, V., Caldwell, R. A. and Bryden, W. L. 2000. Phytate and phytase:consequences for protein utilization. Nutrition Research Reviews 13: 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., and Krikorian, A. D. 1982. Inhibition of trypsin activity in vitro by phytase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 30: 799–800.Google Scholar