Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T16:36:01.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of cross-suckling and presence of additional piglets on suckling behaviour and performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

W. Wattanakul
Affiliation:
SAC, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9YA, United Kingdom School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD, United Kingdom
A. H. Stewart
Affiliation:
SAC, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9YA, United Kingdom
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
SAC, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9YA, United Kingdom
P. R. English
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

In lactating sows and piglets grouped during the suckling period, performance problems have been identified and associated with disruption of suckling (Wattanakul, 1995). Cross-suckling and an increase in number of piglets at the udder have been recognized (Hatet, 1994). The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of these factors on the suckling patterns by manipulating cross-suckling and addition of piglets in individually housed sows.

Type
Pig Welfare
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hatet, G., Edwards, S. A., Gall, K. and Arey, D. S. 1994. Effect of three lactation housing systems on sow and piglet performance and behaviour. BSAP Winter meeting, Scarborough, UK. pp. 189190.Google Scholar
Wattanakul, W., Stewart, A. H., Edwards, S. A. and English, P. R. 1995. A comparison of performance and behaviour of Meishan crossbred sows and piglets in crate and nuiltisuckling systems. BSAS Winter meeting, Scarborough, UK. pp. 194195.Google Scholar