Qualitative assessment of behaviour is based upon the integration by the observer of many pieces of information which in conventional quantitative approaches are recorded separately. Behaviour is for example summed up as ‘fearful’, ‘anxious’ or ‘distressed’. Such interpretations form the core of the lay public's concern for animal suffering, and therefore are frequently dismissed as ‘anthropomorphic’ and unscientific. However, in theory it is possible that such assessments reflect observable aspects of behavioural organization, and may be liable to scientific analysis. A first step in considering this hypothesis is to investigate the interobserver reliability of qualitative assessments. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which untrained observers show agreement in their spontaneous qualitative descriptions of interactive behaviour in growing pigs.