Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T10:17:17.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the in vitro fermentation of four feeds by inocula from bovine rumen digesta and equine caecal digesta, using the pressure transducer technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

R.S. Lowman
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Dept. of Vet Clinical Studies, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
M.K. Theodorou
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB
A.C. Longland
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB
D. Cuddeford
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Dept. of Vet Clinical Studies, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
Get access

Extract

It is generally believed that ruminants are better able to degrade highly fibrous feeds than equines. To determine if this is due to differences between the microflora of the rumen and the equine hind-gut, oatfeed (OF), naked oats (NO), soya hulls (SH) and unmolassed sugar beet pulp (SB) were incubated with inocula prepared from bovine rumen digesta or equine caecal digesta.

OF, NO, SH, and SB were ground to pass through a 1 mm mesh screen and incubated for 72 hours, at 39°C with inocula prepared from either rumen (R) or caecal (C) digesta. Rumen digesta was obtained from three hay-fed, ruminally - fistulated Hereford x Friesian steers, and caecal digesta from three hay-fed, caecally -fistulated, Welsh-cross ponies. Gas production throughout the incubation was measured using the pressure transducer technique (Theodorou et al, 1994). After the incubation, VFA production was measured and residue weights were calculated for each feedstuff.

Type
Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Theodorou, M.K., Williams, B.A., Dhanoa, M.S., McAllan, A.B & France, J (1994). Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 48: 185197.10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar