Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T05:23:43.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the availability of copper in copper: lysine and cupric sulphate for sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

N F Suttle
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, 408 Gilmerton Road, Edinburgh EH 17 7JH
J Brebner
Affiliation:
Moredun Animal Health, Penicuik, Midlothian
Get access

Extract

Chelated trace elements are increasingly used to supplement livestock feeds despite little evidence that they have a higher nutritive value than simpler and cheaper inorganic salts. Advantages for chelated sources should be most evident for elements such as copper (Cu) in the diet of ruminants which rarely absorb more than 10% of the Cu they ingest because of antagonisms with sulphur and molybdenum initiated in the rumen.

A copper:lysine complex (CuPLEX, 100; ZinPro Animal Health Ltd) was, therefore, compared with cupric sulphate (CuSO4.5H2O) for ability to increase liver Cu stores in sheep. Five groups of five Suffolk cross sheep, 10 months old and weighing 44kg on average, received 4.0kg DM daily of a basal diet of (kg/l00kg) whole oats (90.8), urea (1.8), calcium sulphate (1.4), sodium bicarbonate (1.8), and potassium chloride (0.5), with trace elements and vitamins A, D and E coated onto the grain in a sugar solution. A control group received the unsupplemented diet containing 3.5mg Cu/kg DM while four groups received Cu:lysine or CUSO4 added at a lower (1) and a higher (2) level, giving diets containing 9.8 and 14.6 or 8.4 and 13.2mg Cu/kg DM, respectively.

Type
Minerals
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suttle, N.F., Brebner, J., Pass, R. (1996). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Financial support for this study from ZinPro Animal Health Ltd is gratefully acknowledged.Google Scholar