Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T21:28:54.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of sources of inocula and the relationship between the gas production profile, in situ degradability, and perceived nutritive value of some native Nepalese grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

C. Rymer
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Alcester Road, Stratford upon Avon. CV37 9RQ, United Kingdom
S. Calabrò
Affiliation:
Universitá Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via F. Delpino, 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy
B.A. Williams
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wagenigen Institute of Animal Sciences, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG, The Netherlands
H.B. Gurung
Affiliation:
Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Dhankuta, Nepal
D.I. Givens
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Alcester Road, Stratford upon Avon. CV37 9RQ, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

It was observed by Gurung et al. (1996) that Nepalese farmers’ perceptions of the nutritive value of grasses was poorly related to in situ estimates of DM degradability. Recording the gas production (GP) profile of a feed is another method which is used to predict the nutritive value of ruminant feeds. However, many factors affect the GP profile of a feed, of which the source of rumen inoculum is an important one. There were therefore two objectives to this experiment. One was to determine whether the GP profile of the grasses studied by Gurung et al. (1996) was associated with the farmers’ perceived assessment of nutritive value. The other objective was to compare the GP profiles obtained with rumen inocula taken from sheep and buffalo.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Groot, J.C.J., Cone, J.W., Williams, B.A., Debersaques, F.M.A., and Lantinga, E.A. (1996). Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds Animal Feed Science and Technology 64: 7789.10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01012-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurung, H.B., Shrestha, N.P., Chemjong, P.B. and Subba, D.B. (1996) Rumen degradability (dry matter and crude protein) of some rainy season terrace riser grasses in the eastern hills of Nepal. Veterinary Review 11: 1820. Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Dhankuta.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M.K., Williams, B.A., Dhanoa, M.S., McAllan, A.B. and France, J. (1994) A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185197.10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar