Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T21:54:22.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in the bacterial populations in the equine hindgut following the addition of inulin to the diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

C J Newbold*
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
B Macías
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
C Crawford
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
J Elliott
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
P A Harris
Affiliation:
WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, United Kingdom
S R Bailey
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
N R McEwan
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
*
Get access

Extract

Laminitis in the horse is associated with the over consumption of rapidly fermentable carbohydrate, in the form of simple sugars, fructans and/or starch. The fermentation of excessive carbohydrate in the hind-gut can result in the production of lactic acid and other toxins which in turn may act as “laminitis trigger factors.” (Crawford et al., 2007). However, whilst it is known that susceptibility to laminitis varies within the equine population, little is known about the factors governing this variation. We have previously shown that 16S rRNA t-RFLP profile from bacteria extracted from equine faeces clustered weakly into two clades representing normal versus laminitis-prone ponies suggesting a difference in gut microflora between the two groups (Newbold et al., 2008). Here we have extended this observation using real time PCR to investigate changes in the number of streptococci and lactobacilli in the faeces of normal and laminitis-prone ponies following fructan administration.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crawford, C, Sepulveda, MF, Elliott, J, Harris, PA & Bailey, SR 2007 J. Anim Sci. 85, 2949–2958.Google Scholar
Duval, SM, McEwan, NR, Graham, RC, Wallace, RJ & Newbold, CJ 2007 J Appl Microbiol 103, 2132–2141.Google Scholar
Maeda, H, Fujimoto, C, Haruki, Y, Maeda, T, Kokeguchi, S, Petelin, M, Arai, H & Tanimoto, I. 2003 FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 39, 81–86.Google Scholar
Newbold, CJ, Macias, B, Crawford, C, Elliott, J, Harris, PA, Bailey, SR & McEwan, NR 2008 Proc Nutr Soc (in press)Google Scholar