Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:22:42.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Administration of naloxone prior to parturition delays the birth process in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

C L Gilbert
Affiliation:
The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
M I Boulton
Affiliation:
The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
J A Goode
Affiliation:
The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
T J McGrath
Affiliation:
The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
Get access

Extract

An acutely stressful stimulus such as relocation from a familiar strawed pen to an unfamiliar farrowing crate during birth has been shown to interrupt the birth process and inhibit oxytocin secretion (Lawrence et al, 1992). Both of these departures from normal parturition could be prevented by administration of the μ opioid antagonist naloxone. A likely site of action for this effect is presynaptic μ receptors on noradrenergic nerve terminals in the hypothalamus (Onaka et al, 1995). Such a neuro-endocrine control system, if active in the day prior to birth, might influence the timing of the onset of parturition and its subsequent efficiency even in the absence of a stressful stimulus. This experiment tested this hypothesis.

Type
Pig Behaviour & Physiology
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lawrence, et al, (1992). Physiol. Behav. 52 917923.10.1016/0031-9384(92)90371-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Onaka, et al, (1995). J. Physiol. 482 6979.10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chantaraprateep, et al, (1992). Aust. Vet. J. 63 254256.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1986.tb02988.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dial, et al, (1987). Am. J. Vet. Res. 48 966970.Google Scholar
5. Eckerle, et al, (1992). Theriogenology 37 12051212.10.1016/0093-691X(92)90176-RCrossRefGoogle Scholar