Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T09:42:55.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pastoralist parliamentary groups: a comparative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

J. F. Morton*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Pastoralists (broadly speaking, people dependent on extensively grazed livestock for their livelihoods), are a vulnerable group of people who have been marginalised in developmental and political terms, and whose problems are very different from those of people in mainstream agricultural areas. Pastoralist Parliamentary Groups (PPGs), groupings of MPs concerned with the issue of pastoralism, have been formed since 1997 in the national parliaments of Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda (Mohammed Mussa 2004, Livingstone forthcoming a and b). A research project investigated the context, successes and failures of the three PPGs, using interviews with their members and other stakeholders and document review.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mohammed, Mussa 2004 “Case Study on the Pastoral Affairs Standing Committee of Ethiopia” unpublished report By Mohammed Mussa Associates available at: http://www.nri.org/projects/pastoralism/ethiopiafinal.pdf Google Scholar
Keeley, J. and I., Scoones (2003) Understanding Environmental Policy Processes, London, EarthscanGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, J, K. (forthcoming) (a) “Kenya Case Study” and (b) “Uganda Case Study”, PENHA, KampalaGoogle Scholar