Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T22:46:19.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of fishmeal to reduce lamb weight loss on dietary change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

J E Vipond
Affiliation:
The Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
J FitzSimons
Affiliation:
The Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
H Brown
Affiliation:
The Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G Horgan
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service JCMB, Kings Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Get access

Extract

Year round production of lamb Is constrained by the seasonal breeding of the ewe with a shortage of lambs onto the UK market In the first two quarters of the year leading to enhanced prices in this period. Lambs sold onto this market in the past have received little variable premium due to strong market prices. Transfer of support from variable premiums to headage payments in 1992 should encourage farmers to spread the marketing period of lamb into the period of shortage. New systems of storing lamb have been developed involving a housed store period from September to November on a straw based diet followed by turnout to swedes for finishing. Large liveweight loss on adjustment to the straw based diet has been a constraint In previous trials (Dingwall et al, 1989). Previous work on slimming diets for sheep (Vipond et al, 1989) suggests fishmeal supplementation during the changeover period could reduce weight loss and improve performance.

Type
Ruminant nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dingwall, W S (1989). Animal Production 48: 617.Google Scholar
Vipond, J E (1989). Animal Production 48: 131.Google Scholar