Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:26:12.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Electrometric Titration to Improve the Routine Prediction of Silage Intake by Lambs and Dairy Cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

N.W. Offer
Affiliation:
SAC, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
R.J. Dewhurst
Affiliation:
SAC, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
SAC, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
Get access

Extract

Inaccurate prediction of silage intake is a major source of error in ration calculation. Improvement in accuracy depends on the introduction of new routine methods to characterise better the silage fermentation. Electrometric titration has the potential to fill this role as it measures the main fermentation end-products in silage, residual sugar and gives absolute data on buffering characteristics (Offer et al., 1993).

Results are presented for years 1 and 2 of a 3 year study of the use of electrometric titration of silage juice to improve the prediction of silage true DM (TDM) intake (SDMI). Fifty seven silages have been made using a variety of grass and grass-clover mixtures and a wide range of cutting dates (between 25 May and 29 September) and ensilage methods. The following additives were used : none, formic acid (2.5 l/tonne), formic acid (>5 l/tonne), Lactobacillus inoculant, molasses (16 l/tonne), molasses + inoculant. A range of wilting times (0 to 48 hr) was used and in some cases grass was left uncovered in a heap (up to 72 hr) before ensiling.

Type
Food Intake in Ruminants
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Offer, N.W., Rooke, J.A., Dewhurst, R.J. and Thomas, C. (1993). Rapid assessment of silage fermentation characteristics by electrometric titration. Anim.Prod. 56 (3) 423a.Google Scholar