Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-08T04:57:07.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response to thrice-daily milking and its relationship to cisternal storage capacity in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

R.J. Dewhurst
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, The Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr. Scotland KA6 5HW
C.H. Knight
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr. Scotland KA6 5HL
Get access

Extract

Recently there has been increased interest in the effects of changing the milking frequency of dairy cows because of the possibilities of either increased milking frequency, through the use of robot-milkers or of once-daily milking as a part of a programme of extensification. Archer (1983), reviewing the literature and data from herds monitored by Farm Management Services, found milk yield responses on changing from twice- to thrice-daily milking from -0.14 to +0.49. These differences represent large between-animal differences in responses to thrice-daily milking and there is a need to identify sources of this variation.

Milk is stored in the udder in both the cistern and the secretory alveolar tissue itself. Since milk contains a protein which is inhibitory to secretion, storage within the secretory tissue is disadvantageous and reduces the efficiency of secretory tissue. Work at the Hannah Research Institute has shown that the effect of the inhibitor can be overcome by milking more frequently and that the response to thrice-daily milking of goats was greater with animals having smaller cisterns.

Type
Milk Production: 1
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, P. (1983). Milking three times a day. Reading: Milk Marketing Board, Farm Management Services Report No. 34.Google Scholar