Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T04:00:26.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence that Feeding Motivation Alone cannot Explain Oral Stereotypy in Sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Marie Haskell
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
E.M.Claudia Tcrlouw
Affiliation:
INRA, Institut de Recherches sur la Viande, Centre de Clermont- Ferrand - Theix, 63122 St-Genes-Champanelle, France
Alistair B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Hans W. Erhard
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Extract

There has been much debate on the causes of stereotypy, but the motivational bases of these abnormal behaviours have yet to be fully understood. In the case of oral stereotypies in sows, there is evidence that the motivation to perform feeding behaviour may be involved. Restrictively-fed sows are highly food-motivated for large periods of the day. It has been shown that high-fed gilts perform stereotypies at a lower rate than low-fed gilts indicating that the level of feeding is important (Terlouw et al., 1991). Oral stereotypies in sows occur largely within a specific time after the daily food ration has been consumed. In sows housed in barren pens stereotypy is expressed as excessive drinking or chewing bars or chains, while sows housed on straw will nose and chew the bedding excessively in the same time period after feeding (Burbidge et al, 1993). The behaviour patterns are similar to those used in normal food-searching behaviour, but occur in the absence of reward. It has been suggested that oral stereotypy is the result of the appetitive phase of foraging entering a closed loop of repetition as the normal goal, attainment of more food, cannot be achieved (Hughes & Duncan, 1988). Two experiments were designed to examine the behavioural response to size and frequency of food rewards and they represent the first in a series of experiments which investigate the bases of stereotypies.

Type
Pigs
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burbidge, J.A., Spoolder, H.A.M., Lawrence, A.B., Simmins, P.H. and Edwards, S.A., 1993. The effect of feeding regime and the provision of a foraging substrate on the development of behaviours in group-housed sows. Abstract: ISAE conference, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
Hughes, B.O. and Duncan, I.J.H., 1988. The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Anim. Behav., 36: 16961707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E.M.C., Lawrence, A.B. and Illius, A.W., 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Anim. Behav., 42: 981991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E.M.C. and Lawrence, A.B., 1993. Long-term effects of food allowance and housing on development of stereotypies in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 38:103126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar