Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T04:20:43.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of molassed sugar beet feed on pigmeat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

G.R. Nute
Affiliation:
Division of Food Animal Science, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
J.D. Wood
Affiliation:
Division of Food Animal Science, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
F.M. Whittington
Affiliation:
Division of Food Animal Science, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
R.M. Kay
Affiliation:
ADAS Terrington, Terrington St. Clement, Kings Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4PW
J.G. Perrott
Affiliation:
Trident Feeds, P.O. Box 11, Dundle Road, Peterborough, Northants, PE2 9QX
Get access

Extract

It is now accepted that variations in the concentration of skatole in fat tissue are important for the odour and flavour characteristics of pigmeat. Higher values lead to more complaints of ‘off odours’ and taints. Certain husbandry systems and diets have been implicated as producing high skatole concentrations whereas a previous study showed that increasing the concentration of a highly fermentable fibre source such as sugar beet feed reduced skatole levels (Wood, Longland, Enser and Nute, 1993). This was a surprising finding based on the literature (Lundstrom, Malmfors, Malmfors, Stern, Petersson, Mortensen and Sorensen, 1988) and this study was done to provide confirmatory information.

Forty-eight pigs, equal numbers of males and females, were fed a concentrate diet (15.3 MJDE, 215g crude protein per kg) containing different proportions of molassed sugar beet feed (MSBF) between 25 and 85 kg live weight. The proportions were 0, 150, 200 and 250 g/kg MSDF and 12 pigs in each treatment were fed ad libitum.

Type
Meat Quality
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lundstrom, et al, 1988. Livestock Prodn. Sci. 18: 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, et al, 1993. BSAP Occl. Publ. 17: 102103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar