Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:24:40.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of diets differing in the proportion of sugar beet pulp and barley on growth, body composition and metabolism of entire male lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

H Galbraith
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
P Mandebvu
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
J K Thompson
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
MF Franklin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Extract

Previous studies (e.g. Galbraith, McCulloch, Scalfe, Keeling and Atkinson, 1987) showed that differences in growth and metabolic responses Were obtained in sheep offered diets based on barley compared with those offered sugar beet pulp. At similar intakes of dry matter, barley based diets gave faster live-weight gain and heavier carcasses Which contained greater Weights of crude protein and fat and a higher proportion of fat in the carcass than those based on sugar beet pulp. The differences in fat and protein deposition in the carcass are of particular interest particularly in the context of the greater content of cellulose and hemi-cellulose in the fibre component of sugar beet-based diets. The objective of the present study Was to investigate the response to diets based on sugar beet pulp and supplemented With varying proportions of barley. It was Intended to study the utilisation of the diets which differed in the content of fibre and starch and to provide information on whole body, carcass and selected metabolic and endocrine parameters.

Type
Sheep
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Galbraith, H., McCulloch, T., Scaife, J.R., Keeling, B.J. and Atkinson, T. 1987. Animal Production, 46, 514 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
MAFF (1986). Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. The analysis of Agricultural Materials. HMSO Publications. Publication No. 427.Google Scholar