Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:23:42.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in U.S. Export Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Douglas E. Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
Foreign Commerce Section, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Restrictive Business Practices?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Lines, 404 F. 2d 804 (D.C. Cir. 1968).

2 United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Association, 393 U.S. 199 (1968); United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F. Supp. 513 (S.D.N.Y. 1945), aff'd., 332 U.S. 319 (1947).

3 J. P. Rahl, Foreign Commerce Jurisdiction of the American Antitrust Laws, 43 Antitrust L. J. 525 (1974); J. P. Rahl, American Antitrust and Foreign Operations: What is Covered? 8 Cornell Int. L. J. I (1974).

4 Government of India v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 75-95-9751, BNA, Trade Reg. Rep., NO. 749, Feb. 3, 1976, at A-16.

5 These cases are discussed in an April 23,1977 press release by the Justice Department of remarks by me on this question.

6 United States v. General Electric Company, Civ. No. 140-157 (S.D.N.Y. 1958), Consent Judgments, 1962 Trade Cases ¶¶ 70,342, 70,428, 70,546; Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969).