Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:37:53.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Changes in International Administrative Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Hubert Thierry*
Affiliation:
French Society of International Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Year of International Law in Review
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 GA RES. A/RES/50/54, 29 January 1996.

2 GA RES A/RES/33/119 Section 1, paragraph 2, 19 December 1978. On the issue of the fusion of the international administrative jurisdictions, see Paul Tavernier, ANNUAIRE FRANCAIS DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL 442 (1979).

3 See Professor Alain Pellet, LES VOIES DE RECOURS OUVERTES AUX ONCTIONNAIRES INTERNATIONAUX, Pedone (1982), at 19.

4 The possibility of creating a single Administrative Tribunal, A/40/471, July 23, 1985.

5 Fasla: ICJ Reports 1973, p. 166.

6 Mortished: ICJ Reports 1982, p. 325.

7 Yakimetz: 26 ILM 1264 (1987). ICJ Rep. 1987, p. 18

8 The latest report of the Secretary-General on this question is that of December 8, 1995, A/C5/50/2. The observations of the Tribunal are found in UN Doc. A-C/50/2 Add. 1, and those of the CCQAB in UN Doc. A/5(V7/Add. 8.