Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:13:01.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Russian Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov*
Affiliation:
Department of International Law, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; and Diplomatic Academy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peace Operations and the War Powers: A Comparitive Constitutional Assessment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 However, in the course of the legislative process for the enactment of the law, a political compromise was struck in the Diet to freeze the operation of the particular section of the law pertaining to this type of peacekeeping operation, because it was agreed to be premature for Japan to engage in the full-fledged participation in peacekeeping operations going beyond purely logistical support.

The views expressed herein are solely the author's and are not necessarily shared by the Constitutional Court or the Diplomatic Academy. The author would like gratefully to acknowledge the support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, whose grant made possible his participation in this 1996 Annual Meeting of The American Society of International Law.