No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Nathalie Voser
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Should International Arbitration Awards Be Reviewable?
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000
References
1 See, e.g., Isaaki. Dore, The UNCITRAL Framework For Arbitration in Contemporary Perspective 101 (1993).
2 Herrmann, Gerold, Does the World Need Additional Uniform Legislation on Arbitration? The Freshfields Lecture, 15 Arb. Int. 234 (1999)Google Scholar.
3 This opinion is expressed by Philippe Fouchard, in Suggestions to Improve the International Efficacy of Arbitral Awards, ICCA Congress Series no. 9, 601-612 (1998). However, this is not what the author proposes as the best solution. The 1985 Belgian law did adopt this solution, but amended it again on May 19, 1998. See Fouchard, at 613, n. 8.
4 See DORE, supra note 1, at 123-24.
5 Constantin Calavros, Das UNCITRAL Modellgesetz über die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Schriften zum deutschen und europäischen Zivil-, Handels- und Prozessrecht, Band 116, Bielefeld 1988, p. 148.
6 Id. at 31; DORE, supra note l, at 101.
7 See, e.g., the English Arbitration Act, Sections 89-91.
8 Herrmann, supra note 2, at 212.
9 DORE, supra note 1, at 129.
10 See 829 C.P.C.
11 See 829 C.P.C. (5); 823 C.P.C. (3).
12 69 English Arbitration Act. This provision cannot be explained by the fact that the English Arbitration Act is applicable to international and domestic arbitration, since Section 87(1) amends Section 69 and introduces limits to the possibility of waiving the jurisdiction of the courts to decide on appeals on points of laws for domestic arbitration only.
13 § 1059 (2) 1. d) German Arbitration Act.
14 Lars Ulrichs and Richard Akerman, The New Swedish Arbitration Act, to be published in Am. Rev. of Int. Arb. A short overview on the new Swedish arbitration law can also be found in the article of Jarvin, Sigvard and Young, Briana’s article A New Arbitration Regime in Sweden, The Swedish Arbitration Act 1999 and the Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, 16 J. Int. Arb. 89 (1999)Google Scholar.
15 See §§ 33 and 34 Swedish Arbitration Act.
16 Herrmann, supra note 2, at 235; Jan Paulsson, ICCA Congress Series no. 9, 574, 579 (1998).
17 For an overview of the different opinions, see Herrmann, supra note 2, at 235; Park, William W., Duty and Discretion in International Arbitration, 93 AJIL 805, 811 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 § 1061 (3) German Arbitration Act.
19 Paulsson, supra note 16, at 576.
20 Herrmann, supra note 2, at 236; Paulsson, supra note 16, at 576.
21 International Commercial Arbitration—Possible future work in the area of international commercial arbitration—Note by the Secretariat (UN Doc. A/CN .9/460 (Apr. 6,1999), obtainable from <http://www.uncrtral.org/english/sessions/unc/unc-32/acn9-460.htm#M>.
22 Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the Work of Its Thirty-second Session, May 17-June 4, 1999, UN GAOR, 54th Sess. Supp. No. 17, UN Doc. A/54/17, obtainable from <http://www.uncitral.org/english/sessions/unc/unc-32/index.htm>.