Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T04:55:08.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Catherine Amirfar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Catherine Amirfar*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of State

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Inaugural Detlev F. Vagts Roundtable on Transnational Law: Transnational Professional Ethics
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, speaking of government prosecutors, the Supreme Court has stated, “[a] government lawyer is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but” the Supreme Court said, “but of a sovereignty whose obligation… is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.” Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935).