Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:12:01.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Brice Clagett

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Brice Clagett*
Affiliation:
Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State Responsibility in a Multiactor World
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 28 U.S.C. § 1603(b)(2).

2 28 U.S.C. § 1603(b).

3 See, e.g., Charles N. Brower & Jason D. Brueschke, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 615-30 (1998).

4 I do not know the extent to which the ILC considers it one of its functions progressively to develop the law instead of just restating it or describing it. This sometimes becomes an issue for the American Law Institute, and I would not be altogether surprised if similar issues arise at the ILC.

5 Amoco Inťl Finance Corp. v. Iran, 15 Iran-U.S. Cl. Tr. Rep. 189 (1987).

6 Chorzów Factory Case (Ger. v. Pol.), 1928 P.C.I.J. (Ser. A) No. 17 (Sept. 13).

7 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Iran, 21 Iran-U.S. Cl. Tr. Rep. 79 (1989).

8 2 Y.B. Int’l L. Comm’n 2:76 (1993).

9 I should disclose that I was lead counsel for the claimant in the Amoco case.

10 See, e.g., Lieblich, William C., Determinations by International Tribunals of the Economic Value of Expropriated Enterprises, 7 J. Int’l Arb. 37 (1990)Google Scholar; Brower & Brueschke, supra note 4, at 538-46, 575-83.