Article contents
Fraudulent Evidence at the International Court of Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700103374/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700103374a.jpg)
- Type
- Inaugural Detlev F. Vagts Roundtable on Transnational Law: Transnational Professional Ethics
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016
References
1 W. Michael Reisman & Christina Parajon Skinner, Fraudulent Evidence Before Public International Tribunals: The Dirty Stories of International Law 179, 191 (2014).
2 Id. at 8–9.
3 Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahr.), Merits, Judgment, 2001 ICJ Rep. 40, paras. 15–23 (Mar. 16).
4 Id., paras. 15–16.
5 Id., para. 18.
6 Id., para. 19.
7 Id., para. 20.
8 Id., para. 23.
9 Id., para. 20.
10 Id.
11 Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahr.), Order, 1999 ICJ Rep. 3, 7 (Feb. 17).
12 Qatar v. Bahr., 2001 ICJ Rep. at 40, paras. 15–23.
13 Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice, Rule 67(2).
- 1
- Cited by