Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:18:44.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examples of the Political Character of International Water Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Gabriel Eckstein
Gabriel Eckstein*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University; Internet-based International Water Law Project
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
If Water Respects No Political Boundaries, Does Politics Respect Transboundary Waters?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 364 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This paper is based on a presentation given at the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Washington, DC, Apr. 11, 2008.

1 U.N. Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, 21 May 1997, Un. Doc. A/RES/51/229 (1997), reprinted in 37 ILM 700 (1998).

2 See e.g. Case Concerning the Gabèfkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), 1997 I.C.J. 7 (Sept. 25).

3 Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Eighth Session, Shared Natural Resources, 61st Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/61/10) (2006), ¶ 72, at 184.

4 Eckstein, Gabriel, Commentary on the U.N. International Law Commission ‘s Draft Articles on the Law of Transboundary Aquifers, 18 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Poly 538, 553, 560-561 (2007)Google Scholar.

5 See Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of Am., 1 S.W. 75 (1999) (upholding the rule established in Houston & Texas Central Rr. Co. v. East, 81 S.W. 279 (1904), which was based on Frazier v. Brown, 12 OH 294 (1861), one of a number of cases characterizing groundwater as akin to the “occult”).

6 Gabriel Eckstein, Unofficial notes of meeting of UNESCO advisory group to Ambassador Chusei Yamada, Tokyo, Japan, January 28-30, 2008 (on file with author).