Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T14:54:47.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divergent Views on the Charter Norms on the Use of Force—A Transatlantic Divide?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tom Ruys
Tom Ruys*
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Use of Armed Force: Are We Approaching Normative Collapse?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 109 , 2015 , pp. 67 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Waxman, Matthew, Regulating Resort to Force: Form and Substance of the UN Charter Regime, 24: Eur. J. Int’l L. 151-89 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Farer, Tom, Can the United States Violently Punish the Assad Regime?: Competing Visions (Including that of Anthony D’Amato) of the Applicable International Law, 108:4AJIL 701-15 (Oct. 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Id . at 704.

4 See e.g., Corten, Olivier, The Russian Intervention in the Ukrainian Crisis: Was Jus Contra Bellum ‘Confirmed Rather than Weakened’?, 2 J. Use of Force & Int’l L. 17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Franck, Thomas, Who Killed Article 2(4)? Or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States, 64 AJIL 809-37 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Franck, Thomas M., What Happens Now? The United Nations After Iraq, 97 AJIL 607-20 (2003)Google Scholar.

7 Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium, 100 AJIL 88, 94 (FN 18), 98 (2006)Google Scholar.

8 The International Court of Justice quoted this statement in Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 ICJ Rep. 14, ¶ 186 (June 27).

9 Id.

10 2005 World Summit Outcome, G.A. Res. 60/1, U.N. GAOR, 60th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/60/1 (Sept. 16, 2005).

11 See Steven Pinker, The Better Angels of our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (2011).

12 Crawford, James and Nicholson, Rowan, The Continued Relevance of Established Rules and Institutions Relating to the Use of Force, in The Oxford Handbook on the Use of Force in International Law 96, 101 (Weller, Marc ed., 2015)Google Scholar.

13 For an overview, see: Ruys, Tom and Verlinden, Nele, Digest of State Practice: 1 January-30 June 2014, 1 J. Use of Force & Int’l L. 323, 324-36 (2014)Google Scholar.

14 Territorial Integrity of Ukraine, G.A. Res. 68/262, U.N. GAOR, 68th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/69/262 (Mar. 27, 2014).

15 Mearsheimer, John J., Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault – the Liberal Delusions that Provoked Putin, 93 For. Aff. 77 (2014)Google Scholar.

16 Thomas M. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions 30-34 (1995).

17 Tom Ruys, “Armed Attack” and Article 51 of the Un Charter 535-545 (2010).