No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Developments in International Human Rights Litigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- International Litigation: Trends and Developments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
1 70 F.3d 232 (1995), on rehearing, 74 F.3d 377 (2d Cir.), petition for cert, filed (U.S. Apr. 4, 1996) (No.95–1599), cert, denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3832 (U.S. June 17, 1996).
2 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (1993).
3 630 F.2d 886 (2d. Cir. 1980).
4 Id. at 887.
5 Id. at 881.
6 Id. at 878.
7 See Trajano v. Marcos (In re Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos Litigation), 978 F.2d 493,500 (9th Cir. 1992),cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2960 (1993).
8 672 F.Supp 1531 (N.D. Cal. 1987)(Forti I), amended in part, 694 F.Supp 707 (N.D. Cal. 1989)(Forti II).
9 Forti II, 694 F. Supp. at 712.
10 886 F. Supp. 162 (D. Mass. 1995).
11 Id. at 184.
12 Kadic, 70 F.3d at 244.
13 Mushikiwabo v. Barayagwiza, No. 94 Civ. 3627 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.).
14 Pub. L. No. 102–256, 106 Stat. 73 (1992), reprinted in the note following 28 U.S.C.A. § 1350 (1993).
15 Id. at § 2(a)(1).
16 Dec. 10, 1984, S. Treaty Doc. No. 20, 100th Cong., 2d Sess., 23 ILM 1027 (1984), 24ILM 535 (1985).
17 H.R. Rep. No. 367, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 3, reprinted in 1992 USCCAN 84, 85.
18 See Xuncax v. Gramajo, 886 F.Supp. at 178.
19 See Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428 (1989).