No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Eleanor M. Fox
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700022461/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700022461a.jpg)
- Type
- Sovereign Compulsion Defense in Antitrust Litigation: New Life for the Act of State Doctrine?
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1978
References
1 Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341(1943).
2 Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y. 1975), aff'd, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 98 S.Ct. 608 (1977).
3 Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579 (1976).
4 Eastern R.R. President's Conf. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961); United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965).