Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T02:20:48.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Courtney Hostetler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Courtney Hostetler*
Affiliation:
Sudan Divestment Task Force

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Politics of Sudan
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Julie Flint & Alex De Waal, Darfur: A Short History of A Long War (2006).

2 Branch, Adam & Mampilly, Zachariah C., Winning the War, but Losing the Peace? The Dilemma of SPLM/A Civil Administration and the Tasks Ahead, 43 J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 1, 1-20 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Large, Daniel, China and the Changing Context of Development in Sudan, 50 Dev. 57-62, 58 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Downs, Erica, The Fact and Fiction of Sino-African Energy Relations, 3 China Sec. 42-68, 48 (2007)Google Scholar.

5 Government of Sudan Ministry of Finance, Table No. 9: Export by Commodities (2007), obtainable from http://www.cbos.gov.sd/english/econe.htm.

6 Jeffrey Gettleman, War in Sudan? Not Where the Oil Flows, N.Y. Times, Oct. 24, 2006.

7 Peter Goodman, China and Sudan: Partners in Oiland Warfare?, The Wash. Post, Dec. 27, 2004.

8 Christian Aid Society (Uk), The Scorched Earth: Oil and War in Sudan (2001), obtainable from http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2001/chr_aid-sudl4marl.pdf.

9 Supra note 4, at 45.

10 Id. Erica Downs challenges the notion that the policies of Chinese state-owned firms are dictated by the government. Evidence of China’s state policy in Sudan suggests that this can be taken a step further. Indeed, this traditional notion of state and state-owned firm relations has been inverted, with state policy now being influenced by corporations and their assets.