Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T15:16:48.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunity and Human Rights? A Bifurcated Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Rosanne van Alebeek
Rosanne van Alebeek*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, Department of International Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Human Rights Law, Foreign Sovereign Immunity, and National Courts
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 104 , 2010 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, para. 58 (Oct. 2, 1995).

2 Germany v. Prefecture of Voiotia, Areios Pagos [AP] [Supreme Court], 11/2000 (Greece).

3 Ferrini v. Germany, Case No. 5044/4, IDLC 19 (IT 2004), Appeal Decision, para. 58 (Mar. 11, 2004). See also Germany v. Mantelli and Others, Cass., May 29, 2008, n.14201, ILDC 1037. But see U.S. v. Tissino and Others, Cass., Feb. 25, 2009, n. 4461, ILDC 1262, for a possible change in approach.

4 Supra note 3.

5 Ferrini, supra note 3, at para. 9.1.

6 Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina, 965 F.2d 699, 718 (9th Cir. 1992).

7 Al Adsani v. United Kingdom, 35763 Eur. Ct. H.R. 97 (2001) (joint dissenting opinion of Judges Rozakis and Caflisch, joined by Judges Wildhaber, Costa, Cabrai Barreto, and Vajić).

8 Ferrini, supra note 3, at para. 9.2 ff.

9 Al-Adsani, supra note 7, at para. 61.

10 Second Phase Judgment (Eth. v. S. Afr.; Liber, v. S. Afr.), 1966 I.C.J. 46-47, at 248, 277ff (July 18) (separate dissenting opinion of Judge Tanaka).

11 South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa) (Second Phase), ICJ Reports 1966 6, 248, Dissenting Opinion Judge Tanaka, 277ff.

12 Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002), Judgment (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Rwanda), 2006 I.C.J. 4, at para. 64 (Feb. 3).

13 Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law 308 (2d ed. 2008)Google Scholar.

14 Lozano v. Italy, Cass., sez. I penale, 19 June 2008, n. 31171, ILDC 1085; Italy v. Milde, Cass., sez. I penale, 21 oct. 2008, n. 1072, ILDC 1224.

15 Yousuf, 552 F.3d at 371.

16 Verlinden Bv v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 461 U.S. 480, 486 (1983); Rep. of Austria v. Altmann, 541 U.S. 677, 696 (2004).

17 Murray v. Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. 64, 118 (1804).

18 International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg Judgment (1946), reprinted in 41 AJIL 172, 221 (1947).

19 CrimA 40/61 Attorney General of Israel v. Eichmann [1962] 36 ILR 277.

20 R v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 2), [1999] 1 A.C. 147 (appeal taken from Q.B.) (Amnesty International and others intervening); R v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3), [1999] 2 W.L.R. 827 (H.L.) (appeal taken from Q.B.).

21 Jones v. Saudi Arabia, [2006] 1 AC 270 (H.L.) (appeal taken from EWCA Civ 1394).