Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:03:03.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of the Surgical and Rehabilitation Response to the Earthquake in Haiti, January 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Anthony D. Redmond*
Affiliation:
Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, UK
Simon Mardel
Affiliation:
Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, UK
Bertrand Taithe
Affiliation:
Handicap International, France
Thomas Calvot
Affiliation:
Handicap International, France
Jim Gosney
Affiliation:
Handicap International, France
Antony Duttine
Affiliation:
Handicap International, France
Susan Girois
Affiliation:
Handicap International, France
*
Correspondence: Anthony D Redmond, MD Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, E-mail: tony.redmond@manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: The disaster response environment in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake represented a complex healthcare challenge. This study was designed to identify challenges during the Haiti disaster response.

Methods: Qualitative and quantitative study of injured patients carried out six months after the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti to review the surgical inputs of foreign medical teams.

Results: Study findings revealed a need during the response for improved medical records and data gathering for regulation, quality assurance, coordination and resource allocation; wider adherence to standard patient referral mechanisms and protocols linking surgical service provision with appropriate hospital and community based rehabilitation services; a greater recognition of the impact of non-amputation injury, and the need for patients to have a greater say in their management and to be the keepers of their medical records. Key first steps to improving the international response are a minimum dataset and uniform reporting.

Conclusion: This study showed that challenges for emergency medical response during the Haiti Earthquake involved issues of accountability, professional ethics, standards-of-care, unmet needs, patient agency and expected outcomes for patients in such settings:

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright Redmond © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.PAHO/WHO Situation Report on Health Activities Post Earthquake Sit Reps 2 March 2010, 18 May 2010 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/43990290/Eitel-Haiti-Feb-Mar-2010-Report--final-draft# accessed 14/11/11.Google Scholar
2.Earthquake in Haiti one year later, January 2011, PAHO/WHO, 2011, pp. 6-8. http://new.paho.org/disasters/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1475&Itemid=1 accessed 14/11/11.Google Scholar
3.Van Hoving, DJ, Wallis, LA, Docrat, F, De Vries, S: Haïti disaster tourism—A medical shame. Prehosp Disaster Med 2010;25(3):201202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Barriball, KLWhile A: Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nursing 1994;19(2):328335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Vanholder, R, Gibney, N.Luyckx, VA, Sever MS Renal disaster relief task force in Haiti earthquake. Lancet 2010;375(9721):1162–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Brodwin, PE“Politics, Practical logic and Primary health care in rural Haiti” Medical Anthropology Qauaterly 1997;11:1, 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.PAHO/WHO January 24, 2010 Emergency Operations Center Situation Report Number 11, Haiti Earthquake). http://reliefweb.int/node/341573 accessed 14/11/11.Google Scholar
8.Paranteau, WHHavens, JMHarrington, SGates, JD (2010) “Reestablishing surgical care at Port au Prince general hospital Haiti” J AM Coll Surg 211, 1, 126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Redmond, AD, O'Dempsey, TJ, Taithe, B“Disasters and a register for foreign medial teams” Lancet 2011;377(9771):1054–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar