Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-gkscv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T21:05:49.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist Does Impact Pediatric Disaster Planning and Preparedness in Chicago: A Comparison of 2012 and 2016 EMSC Facility Recognition Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Paul Severin
Affiliation:
Rush University Medical Center/Stroger Hospital, Chicago, United States
Evelyn Lyons
Affiliation:
Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, United States
Elisabeth Weber
Affiliation:
Chicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, United States
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.

Aim:

The goal of this study was to identify the impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist across time in Chicago hospitals undergoing Pediatric Facility Recognition.

Methods:

Chicago hospitals were evaluated during the 2012 and 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition Program. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. Data from 2012 and 2014 checklist categories were compared and p-values were computed utilizing Fisher’s Exact Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Stockpiling of staging areas or having ready access to resuscitation supplies increased 46% (p < 0.05), testing of pediatric surge capacity in previous 24 months decreased 43% (p < 0.05), maintaining warmed water source for decontamination decreased 43% (p < 0.05), and having familiarity of evacuation procedures in ED, pediatric, and nursery personnel decreased 42% (p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, the training of pediatric staff with JumpSTART triage increased 59%, EOP containing a pediatric reunification process increased by 36%, the presence of specific staff plans to allow care of dependents increased for children (29%), elderly (32%) and pets (35%), integration of a pediatric component into hospital EOP increased by 29%, and identification of an alternate treatment site for children decreased by 25%.

Discussion:

Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the facility recognition process impacts pediatric disaster preparedness and planning, and identifies areas of improvement in hospitals.

Type
Pediatrics
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019