Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:21:47.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Amateur Radio in National and International Disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Lawrence S. Higgins  and
Jan D. Smith
Lawrence S. Higgins
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Anesthesiology (J.S.) and Internal Medicine (L.H.), University of Texas, Health Science Center, San Antonio TX 78284, USA.
Jan D. Smith
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Anesthesiology (J.S.) and Internal Medicine (L.H.), University of Texas, Health Science Center, San Antonio TX 78284, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Appreciation of reliable commuications might seem universal; yet when natural disasters strike, few communities are equipped to handle these essential needs. In many instances their ability to notify the rest of the world about their disaster is seriously impaired. Why this is so and why Amateur Radio Operators, or “hams”, always seem to play such a vital part in community survival is the topic of this article.

The best communication systems can fail from traffic overload. As an example, there may be little if any loss of telephone lines or commerical radio links; yet the local population can totally paralyze a system simply by picking up the phone and calling someone. An analogy to this stoppage of communications traffic is seen daily on our expressways as too many cars enter and exceed some critical density at which all traffic must stop.

Type
Part III: International Organizations - Planning - Disaster Events
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , supplement S1: Disaster Resuscitology , 1985 , pp. 339 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Naftzinger, G, Denniston, B, Ackley, J et al. Hurricane anthology. QST 64(February):45–51, 1980.Google Scholar
2. Byers, C. A terrible Tuesday. QST 63(August): 53–55, 1979.Google Scholar
3. Goldstein, MJ, Powers, CH. Missassauga evacuated — “Hams” help. QST 64(March):50–53, 1980.Google Scholar
4. Jensen, L. California “Hams” assist during mud/floodcrisis. QST 64(June): 11–13, 1980.Google Scholar
5. Peters, B. Public service before disaster strikes. QST 63(April):52–53, 1979.Google Scholar
6. Jones, JM. Handling a hurricane net. QST 64(October):92, 19980.Google Scholar
7. Halpern, R. Organizing a training net. QST 65(January):87–88, 1981.Google Scholar
8. Mallette, M. Red Cross division emergency communications. QST 64(October):50–52, 1980.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, B. Beyond differences of language, nationality, religion and political systems. QST 62(November):59, 1978.Google Scholar
10. Hart, G. ARES and you. QST 63 (March):51–53, 1979.Google Scholar
11. Shreve, RB. SKYWARN — a design for public service. QST 65(August)61–62, 1981.Google Scholar
12. Brown, JH, Lievsay, D. Amateurs in the thick of volcano action. QST 64(August):47, 1980.Google Scholar
13. Horzopa, S. Amateur radio shines through the blizzard blitz of 78. QST 62(August):37–39, 1978.Google Scholar