Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:29:21.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-Hospital Care Quality Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Emil Pascarelli
Affiliation:
From theNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Maspeth, New York, USA.
Anthony Ciorciari
Affiliation:
From theNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Maspeth, New York, USA.

Extract

Paramedic units have awakened a new concept in prehospital care in the USA. New emergency medical services (EMS) administrations, better educated personnel, and mass public awareness through media events have all contributed to the change.

Operational changes designed to tighten control of the emergency medical technician (EMT) and paramedic came about through deployment of ambulances and categorization and designation of emergency hospitals. Clinical changes have given the EMS responder, particularly the paramedic, a great deal of freedom in the care given to patients. The paramedic, who uses subjective criteria, can administer care ranging from Standard First Aid to advanced cardiology. Subjective control should be rigid for the EMT or paramedic, when cognitive abilities include only knowledge, comprehension and application, but not for those who have had a chance to exercise analytic and synthetic skills in pre-hospital training programs.

Type
Part I: Research-Education-Organization
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Ambulatory Care Quality Assurance Project: US Government Printing office, Washington, DC, December 1976:12a–12d.Google Scholar
2. National Academy of Sciences: Institution of Medicine. Assessing Quality in Health Care: An Evaluation. Washington, DC, November 1976: 18.Google Scholar