Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T06:10:49.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Concept of Assisted Management of Large-Scale Disasters by Horizontal Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
The Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, Departments of Emergency Medicine and International Health, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, and the Advanced Systems Concept Office, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Department of Defense, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA
Robin Hayden
Affiliation:
Public Relations, Center of Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance, Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, USA
*
The Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument Street, Suite 6-100, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, E-mail: fburkle@jhmi.com

Abstract

Management of large-scale disasters is impeded by inadequately designed organizational infrastructure. The vertical organizational structures of most agencies responding to disasters contribute to a poorly integrated response, especially when collaboration, information sharing, and coordination are required. Horizontal (or lateral) organizations have assisted traditionally vertical civilian and military agencies by enhancing their capacity to operate successfully in complex human emergencies and large-scale natural disasters. Because of the multiagency and highly technical multidisciplinary requirements for decision-making in chemical and biological disasters, similar horizontal management options must be considered.

Type
Special Reports
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Granot, H: Emergency interorganizational relationships. Disaster Prevention and Management 1990;6(5):305310.Google Scholar
2. Comfort, LK: Turning conflict into cooperation: Organizational designs for community response in disasters. International Journal of Mental Health 1990;19 (1):89108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ostroff, F: The Horizontal Organization. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999. pp 372.Google Scholar
4. Schneider, SK: Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review 1992;52(2):135145.Google Scholar
5. De Bono, E: Lateral Thinking. Harper & Row: New York, 1990. pp 51148.Google Scholar
6. Jacob, R: The struggle to create an organization for the 21st century. Fortune 03 April 1995.Google Scholar
7. Black, RA: Out-of-box, in-the-box, new-box, other-box, no-box thinking. 03 September 2000. http://www.cre8.com/newsletter/newsll.htmlGoogle Scholar
8. Minear, L, Weiss, TG, Campbell, K: Humanitarianism and War: Learning Lessons from Recent Armed Conflicts. Providence, RI: TJ Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University 1991 pp 3037.Google Scholar
9. Pugh, M. Military intervention and humanitarian action: Trends and issues. Disasters 1998;22(4):339351.Google Scholar
10. Tanguy, J: Letter to Disaster Response Committee, InterAction. Medecins Sans Frontieres/Doctors Without Borders-USA, dtd: 14 April 2000.Google Scholar
11. Booth, J: ‘Crisis junkies’ hurt aid efforts, expert charges. The Ottawa Citizen. Section News, A10, 03 September 2000.Google Scholar
12. Kaufmann, AF, Meltzer, MI, Schmid, GP: The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: Are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997;3(2):113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Seiple, C: Consequence management: Domestic response to weapons of mass destruction. Parameters Autumn 1997:119134.Google Scholar
14. Exercise Working Group: After action report: Brave Knight 1998. 1 Exercise. Center of Excellence in HA/DM, Honolulu, 26 Feb–3 Mar 1998:122.Google Scholar
15. Hersman, R, Cams, WS: Department of Defense and consequence management: Mitigating the effects of chemical and biological attack. Strategic Forum, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, No 169, December 1999.Google Scholar
16. Burkle, FM, Frost, DS, Greco, SB, Petersen, HV, Lillibridge, SR: Strategic disaster preparedness and response: Implications for military medicine under joint command. Military Medicine, 1996;161: 442447.Google Scholar
17. Service management strategies: Delta 782. Center of excellence critical successes factors, 09 September 2000. http://www.metagroup.com/communities/opsex/sms782.htmGoogle Scholar
18. Drucker, PF: Playing in the information based ‘Orchestra’. Wall Street Journal, 04 June 1985.Google Scholar
19. Hood-Morris, R: The face of information ttechnology in the ebusiness company. http://www.mks.com/press/newsletter/article/its-0999.htm 03 September 2000.Google Scholar
20. Mintzberg, H: The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall Publishers: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979. pp 2630.Google Scholar
21. Grabowski, M, Roberts, KH: Risk mitigation in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications 1998;3(4). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/grabowski.html.Google Scholar
22. Ross, GA: The emergence of organization sets in three ecumenical disaster recovery organizations: An empirical and theoretical exploration. Human Relations. 33;10:2333.Google Scholar
23. Cleveland, H: Inner edge online-The future is uncentralized. 03 September 2000. http://inneredge.com/html/article/v3nl-l.htm.Google Scholar
24. Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A, Kohama, A, Takasu, N, Ishimatsu, S: The Tokyo subway sarin attack: Disaster management. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5(Parts 1-3):613628.Google Scholar
25. Galbraith, JR: A review of designing organizations: An executive briefing on strategy, structure and process. 03 September 2000, http://www.mulpondgroup.com/artorgdesign2.html.Google Scholar
26. Mulford, CL: Interorganizational Relations. Human Sciences Press: New York, 1984.Google Scholar
27. Cole, T. When a bioweapon strikes, who will be in charge? JAMA 2000;284:944948.Google Scholar
28. Quarentelli, EL: Social and organizational problems in a major emergency. Emergency Planning Digest 1982;9:710.Google Scholar
29. Burkle, FM: Lessons learned and future expectations of complex emergencies. BMJ 1999;321:15.Google Scholar