Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:01:41.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(A71) Prospective Evaluation of “Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma” Done by Emergency Physicians, and its Comparative Analysis with Radiologist's Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

T.P. Sinha
Affiliation:
Surgery, 110029, India
S. Bhoi
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, New Delhi, India
S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Orthopedics, Delhi, India
A. Bhasin
Affiliation:
Medicine, 110029, India
M. Rodha
Affiliation:
Surgery, 110029, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of emergency physicians in detecting free fluid in the abdomen when compared to radiologists during w primary survey of trauma victims by focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) scan in the emergency department.

Methods

This prospective study was performed during a primary survey of the resuscitation of non-consecutive patients in the resuscitation bay. The study subjects included emergency physicians (EP) [one emergency medicine (EM) consultant, two EM residents, one orthopedic resident, and one surgical resident] who underwent training at a three-day workshop on emergency sonography and performed 10 supervised positive and negative scans for free fluid. The FAST scans were performed by the EPs and then by the radiology resident (RR). Both were blinded to each other's sonography findings. Computed tomography (CT) scan and laparatomy findings were used as gold standard. Results were compared between both groups. Intra-observer variability among EPs and level of agreement between EPs and RRs were assessed.

Results

One hundred fifty scans performed by EPs and RRs were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 28 [1–70] years. Out of 24 true positive patients, 18 underwent CT scan, and exploratory laparatomy was done in six patients. Intra-observer performance variation ranged from 87–97%. The sensitivity of FAST performed by EP and RR was 100%. The specificity of FAST by EPs was 95.4% vs. 98.4% by RRs. The level of agreement was 100%.

Conclusions

This study proves that FAST scan performed by EPs who are trained in short course of ultrasonography can be reliable and accurate when compared to a qualified radiologist.

Type
Abstracts of Scientific and Invited Papers 17th World Congress for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011