Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:14:15.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

60. The Impact of AEDs on Cardiac Survival in an Urban Out-of-Hospital Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Harinder S. Dhindsa
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Hospital and District of Columbia EMS, Washington, DC, USA
Dennis Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Hospital and District of Columbia EMS, Washington, DC, USA
David Milzman
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Hospital and District of Columbia EMS, Washington, DC, USA
Robert R. Bass
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Hospital and District of Columbia EMS, Washington, DC, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Prior studies have documented less than 3% survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) in D.C. EMS intubation has failed to improve extremely poor survival rates for out of hospital CA. This study will investigate whether the addition of automatic external defibrillator (AED) use will improve the negligible survival rate experienced in a system that transports 80,000 pts/yr; Thus replicating success with AED for CA in other centers.

Methods: Retrospective review of all CA data from D.C. EMS system from 1-12/91 (no AED) vs. 1-12/93 (AED in use). Supporting data from run sheets and hospital records was compared for years with and without the AED using student's t test, chi-square with p <0.05.

Results: In 1991 there were 414 out of hospital CAs arrests with an overall survival rate of 2.3% with a mean EMS arrival time of 10 minutes. There were no significant differences with respect to CA patients’ age, bystander CPR or BLS/ALS response times between two years (1991 and 1993) p = NS. In VF patients who comprised 26% and 24% of presenting rhythms for ’91 and ’93 respectively, the use of AEDs improved survival 3.8% vs. 29% with AEDs in ’93 (p <0.05). There was no difference in percentage of non-VF presenting rhythms or patient outcomes between the two groups.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996