Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:16:09.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's the matter by Kansas? Legislative debates over stem cell research in Kansas and Massachusetts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Bonnie Stabile
Bonnie Stabile*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy, George Mason University, 3401 Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1, Arlington, Virginia 22201 bstabile@gmu.edu
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the contextual factors shaping legislative debates affecting stem cell research in two states, Kansas and Massachusetts, which both permit therapeutic cloning for stem cell research but markedly vary in their legislative approach to the issue. In Kansas, restrictive legislation was proposed but effectively blocked by research proponents, while in Massachusetts permissive legislation was successfully implemented under the auspices of an act to promote stem cell research. The importance of university and industry involvement is highlighted in each case, as are the roles of enterprising and persistent policy entrepreneurs. Providing a close examination of the policy process attending the cloning debate in these states is intended to contribute to an enhanced understanding of the cloning-policy process as it has played out at the state level, with an eye toward informing legislative debates over related biotechnical advances in the future.

Keywords

cloningstem cell researchbiotechnology policy
Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 17 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stabile, Bonnie, “Where are the clones? An evolution of policy terminology,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 2008.Google Scholar
2.Stabile, Bonnie, “Balancing morality and economy: The case of state human cloning policies,” dissertation (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, 2006).Google Scholar
3.Ibid.Google Scholar
4.Christoff, Chris, “State senate decides to ban human cloning and fine those who try,” Detroit Free Press, 29 April 1998: http://www.freep.com/news/mich/qclone29.htm.Google Scholar
5.“Legislators may ban cloning,” The Michigan Daily 16 April 1998: http://www.pub.umich.edu/daily/1998/apr/04-16-98/news/news11.html.Google Scholar
6.Fukuyama, Francis, “Our cloning policy, hostage to a stalemate,” The Washington Post 15 February 2004: B4.Google Scholar
7.Frank, Thomas, What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2004).Google Scholar
8.Enserink, Martin, “Is Holland becoming the Kansas of Europe?” Science, 3 June 2005: 1394.Google Scholar
9.Frank, Thomas, What's the Matter with Kansas?Google Scholar
10.Stabile, Bonnie, “Demographic profile of states with human cloning laws: Morality policy meets political economy,” Politics and the Life Sciences, September 2007, 26(1): 43–50.Google Scholar
11.Gray, Virginia, “The socioeconomic and political context of states,” in Politics in the American States (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2004), p. 3.Google Scholar
12.Stabile, Bonnie, “Balancing morality and economy.”Google Scholar
13.Fukuyama, Francis, “Our cloning policy.”Google Scholar
14.Cook, Mary Pilcher, http://www.pilchercook.com/html/views.html.Google Scholar
15.Cook, Mary Pilcher, telephone interview with author, 12 July 2005.Google Scholar
16.Rothschild, Scott, “Bill bans human cloning research,” Lawrence Journal-World, 4 May 2001: http://6news.ljworld.com/section/legislatureold/storypr/51460.Google Scholar
17.Ibid.Google Scholar
18.Milburn, John, “House advances anti-cloning, human embryo bills,” The Topeka Capital-Journal 22 March 2002: http://www.cjonline.com/stories/032202/bre_embbill.shtml.Google Scholar
19.Ibid.Google Scholar
20.Ibid.Google Scholar
21.“Kansas House approves bills banning human cloning, use of embryos for research,” Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, 28 March 2002: http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=10301&dr_cat=2.Google Scholar
22.Cook, , interview.Google Scholar
23.Nielsen, Marcia, interview with author, 18 July 2005.Google Scholar
24.Atkinson, Barbara, “Testimony before the Kansas House Federal and State Affairs Committee,” 16 March 2005.Google Scholar
25.Ibid.Google Scholar
26.Ibid.Google Scholar
27.Ibid.Google Scholar
28.“Ban could harm science reputation; proposed clone, stem cell ban has researchers rethinking Kansas.” Lawrence Journal-World, 11 February 2005: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/feb/11/ban_could_harm/?print.Google Scholar
29.Cook, , interview.Google Scholar
30.Lawrence Journal-World, “Ban could harm science.”Google Scholar
31.Marie Jennings, interview with author, 18 July 2005.Google Scholar
32.Ibid.Google Scholar
33.Stowers Institute, www.stowers-institute.org.Google Scholar
34.Stowers Institute, http://www.stowers-institute.org/MediaCenter/docs/FactSheet.pdf.Google Scholar
35.Atkinson, , “Testimony.”Google Scholar
36.Slevin, Peter, “In heartland, stem cell research meets fierce opposition,” The Washington Post 10 August 2005: A1.Google Scholar
37.“Wilk to receive national award at event at KU,” The Lansing Current, 7 July 2005: http://www.lansingcurrent.com/news/2005/jul/07/wilk_receive_national_award_even…/?prin.Google Scholar
38.http://www.kennywilk.com.Google Scholar
39.“Wilk to receive national award at event at KU.”Google Scholar
40.“Kansas House, Senate approve measure that would encourage bioscience research in the state,” Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, 6 April 2004: http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=23055.Google Scholar
41.Slevin, , “In heartland.”Google Scholar
42.Wilk, Kenny, interview with author, 18 July 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Ibid.Google Scholar
44.Taylor, John, “Wilk receives national award,” Lawrence Journal-World 11 July 2005: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/jul/11/wilk_receives_national_award/?print.Google Scholar
45.Wilk, , interview.Google Scholar
46.Ibid.Google Scholar
47.Page, Susan and Lawrence, Jill, “Does ‘Massachusetts liberal’ label still matter?” USA Today, 25 July 2004: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-25-mass-liberal_x.htm.Google Scholar
48.Kamarck, Elaine, “Can outdated label still hurt Kerry?” The Boston Globe 11 July 2004: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/07/11/can_outdated_label_still_hurt_kerry.Google Scholar
49.Stabile, , “Demographic profile.”Google Scholar
50.Gray, , “Socioeconomic and political context.”Google Scholar
51.Greenberger, Scott S. and Phillips, Frank, “Stem cell bill tops agenda as Legislature convenes; Travaglini vows push on research,” The Boston Globe, 6 January 2005: http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/01/06/stem_cell_bill_tops_agenda_as_leg…Google Scholar
52.http://www.mass.gov/legis/journal/sj010505.htm.Google Scholar
53.Greenberger, and Phillips, , “Stem cell bill.”Google Scholar
54.Ibid.Google Scholar
55.Fenn, Jennifer, “Koutoujian to file pro-stem cell legislation; representative wants to authorize embryonic research, ban cloning,” Sentinel Enterprise 22 November 2004: http://travisroyfoundation.org/images/articles-releases/Sentinel%20-%201104.htm.Google Scholar
56.Kerber, Ross, “Mass. Legislators back work on embryonic stem cells; House and Senate leaders respond to Calif. initiative,” The Boston Globe 11 November 2004: http://www.boston.com/b…/mass_legislators_back_work_on_embryonic_stem_cells?mode=P.Google Scholar
57.Ibid.Google Scholar
58.Ibid.Google Scholar
59.Reilly, Adam, “Soft cell; why isn't the Catholic Church fighting harder on stem-cell research? Also, Maura Hennigan finally makes it official,” The Boston Phoenix 11–17 March 2005: http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multi-page/documents.Google Scholar
60.“Former Speaker reverses stand on stem-cell research,” The Boston Globe, 10 November 2004: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2004/11/10/former_speaker_reverses_stand_on_stem_cell_research.Google Scholar
61.Ibid.Google Scholar
62.Abraham, Yvonne, “Church sets voter drive to fight gay marriage,” The Boston Globe, 26 March 2004: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2004/03/26/church_sets_voter_dr.Google Scholar
63.Ann Dufresne, telephone conversation with author, 10 June 2005.Google Scholar
64.Powers, Rosemary, interview with author, 29 June 2005.Google Scholar
65.Ibid.Google Scholar
66.Press release, www.macathconf.org.Google Scholar
67.Reilly, , “Soft cell.”Google Scholar
68.Avila, Dan, interview with author, 29 June 2005.Google Scholar
69.Park, Sarah L., “Professor studies stem cells,” The Harvard Crimson 28 February 2002: http://www.thecrimson.com/printerfriendly.aspx?ref=161961.Google Scholar
70.Gellis, David H., “Harvard fights cloning ban,” The Harvard Crimson 24 April 2002: http://www.thecrimson.com/printerfriendly.aspx?ref=205273.Google Scholar
71.Xu, Risheng, “Culturing support for stem cells,” The Harvard Crimson 9 June 2005: http://www.thecrimson.com/printerfriendly.aspx?ref=508109.Google Scholar
72.Ibid.Google Scholar
73.Ibid.Google Scholar
74.Powers, , interview.Google Scholar
75.(??) Xu, “Culturing Support for Stem Cells.”Google Scholar
76.LeBlanc, Steve, “Charged with setting stem cell policy, lawmakers struggle with the science,” The Boston Globe 18 February 2005: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/02/18/charged_with_settin.Google Scholar
77.“MassCURE (Massachusetts Citizens United for Research Excellence), a broad-based Coalition, will advocate for regenerative medicine and embryonic stem cell research and somatic cell nuclear transfer; new poll shows broad support for embryonic stem cell research as well as nuclear transfer,” press release, 16 March 2005 : http://www.hms.harvard.edu/news/releases/3_16MassCURE.html.Google Scholar
78.Ibid.Google Scholar
79.Inferna, Jennifer, interview with author, 28 June 2005.Google Scholar
80.Ibid.Google Scholar
81.Ibid.Google Scholar
82.Murray, Andy, “Finneran building biotech image,” Eagle-Tribune 7 November 2004: http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20041107/BU_002.htm.Google Scholar
83.Ibid.Google Scholar
84.Ibid.Google Scholar
85.Ibid.Google Scholar
86.Tuohy, Dan, “Lawmakers have biotech capital in their sights,” Eagle-Tribune 9 January 2005: http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20050109/FP_001.htm.Google Scholar
87.Voss, Gretchen, “Hard cell,” Boston Magazine, March 2005: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/ArticleDisplay.php?id=53&print=yes.Google Scholar
88.Ibid.Google Scholar
89.Shea, Douglas, interview with author, 28 June 2005.Google Scholar
90.Ibid.Google Scholar
91.Kingdon, John W., Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (New York: Harper Collins College Publishers, 1995): 179.Google Scholar
92.Ibid., 46.Google Scholar
93.Ibid., 49.Google Scholar