Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:16:41.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protection from What? The Secret Life of Donor Insemination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Rona Achilles
Rona Achilles*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, City of Toronto, Canada
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
INTERNATIONAL ROUNDTABLE
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 1993 , pp. 171 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilles, R. (1986). “The Social Meanings of Biological Ties: A Study of Participants in Artificial Insemination by Donor.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Achilles, R.(forthcoming). “The Social Meanings of Donor Insemination.” Ottawa: Royal Commission On New Reproductive Technologies.Google Scholar
Annas, G.J. (1981). “Fathers Anonymous: Beyond the Best Interests of the Sperm Donor.” Child Welfare, 60:161–74.Google Scholar
Baran, A. and Pannor, R. (1989). Lethal Secrets: The Shocking Consequences and Unsolved Problems of Artificial Insemination. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society and Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (1990). Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies. Toronto: Ribsome Communications.Google Scholar
Del Valle, A.P., Ruberto, C., Munshi, S., Olson, J.H., and Snoey, D. (1992). “Donor Attitudes Toward Providing Medical and Personal Information For Recipients and Donor Offspring.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Alberta.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society (1990). “Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies.” Fertility and Sterility 53(6)(Supplement 2):445.Google Scholar
Haimes, E. (1993). “Issue of Gender in Gamete Donation.” Social Science and Medicine 36:85–93.Google Scholar
Infertility Awareness (1989). Special issue. 5(6) July/August.Google Scholar
Karow, M.A. (1992). “Be Prepared: Save Donor Information.” Resolve (October):3, 9.Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan (1987). Proposals for a Human Artificial Insemination Act. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Minister of Justice.Google Scholar
Mahlstedt, P.P. and Probasco, K.A. (1991). “Sperm Donors: Their Attitudes Toward Providing Medical and Psychosocial Information for Recipient Couples and Donor Offspring.” Fertility and Sterility 56:747–53.Google Scholar
Snowden, R., Mitchell, G.D., and Snowden, E.M. (1983). Artificial Reproduction: A Social Investigation. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar