Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:47:06.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matt Young and Taner Edis, eds., Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism (Piscataway, NJ:Rutgers University Press,2004), 196 pages + back matter. ISBN 0-8135-3433-X. Hardcover, $24.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Angus J. L. Menuge
Angus J. L. Menuge*
Affiliation:
Concordia University Wisconsin 12800 N. Lake Shore Drive Mequon, WI 53097 USA Angus.Menuge@cuw.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , September 2008 , pp. 52 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Minnich, Scott A. and Meyer, Stephen C.“Genetic analysis of coordinate flagellar and type III regulatory circuits in pathogenic bacteria,” page 8. Available online athttp://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science&id=2181.Google Scholar
2. Morris, Simon Conway, Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
3. For a recent example, seeFord Doolittle, W. and Bapteste, Eric, “Pattern Pluralism and the Tree of Life Hypothesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 29 January 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.10699104.Google Scholar
4. Gonzalez, Guillermo and Richards, Jayargue that carbon is much better suited than silicon to the diverse chemistry needed to support complex life: seeThe Privileged Planet (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Books, 2004), 32.Google Scholar