Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:44:11.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editor-in-Chief’s introduction to the issue and volume 41 in review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2023

Gregg R. Murray
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Spring 2023 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Friesen, A., Ksiazkiewicz, A., & McDermott, R. (2022). Introduction to the Special Issue—Life Science in Politics: Methodological Innovations and Political Issues. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. (2023). In Memoriam: Joseph Losco. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 163–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosal, M., & Putney, J. (2023). Neurotechnology and international security: Predicting commercial and military adoption of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) in the United States and China. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021). Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, D. (2023). Expanding our thinking about discrete emotions and politics. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 146–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, J., Rosman, T., Kelava, A., & Merk, S. (2022). Do Open-Science Badges Increase Trust in Scientists Among Undergraduates, Scientists, and the Public?. Psychological Science, 33(9), 1588–1604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. III, Hampton, C., Tripp, H., & Brandon, W. (2023). Acculturation, Hispanic Ethnicity, and Trust: Verifying and Explaining Racial/Ethnic Differences in Trust in Health Providers in North Carolina Medicaid. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 120–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, K., & Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, S. (2023). Scientists as spies?: Assessing U.S. claims about the security threat posed by China’s Thousand Talents Program for the U.S. life sciences. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinschenk, A., Dawes, C., Klemmensen, R., & Rasmussen, S. (2023). Genes, personality, and political behavior: A replication and extension using Danish twins. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed