Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T03:05:00.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The death of distinctions: From 9/11 to Abu Ghraib

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

John Ellis van Courtland Moon
John Ellis van Courtland Moon*
Affiliation:
Fitchburg State College, 160 Pearl Street, Fitchburg, MA 01420-2697, USA jevcm@aol.com
Get access

Abstract

War, the great simplifier, is the inevitable enemy of distinctions, especially when conflicts evoke survival fears, sounding echoes from humanity's environment of evolutionary adaptation. Throughout the twentieth century, attackers and targets grew more distant, weaponry grew more destructive, and distinctions — between combatants and civilians, between legitimate and protected targets, between defensive and offensive strategies, between the innocent and the guilty — faded. In the twenty-first century's first major conflict, “the war against terror,” distinctions have faded still further, making nearly indistinguishable the frontier between preemption and prevention and between interrogation and torture. Proclaimed a “new type of war” in which old rules and customary safeguards would often be inapplicable, this conflict quickly came to be characterized by political embarrassment and operational scandal.

Type
View Point
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , September 2004 , pp. 2 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Address before a Joint Session of the Congress of the United States: Response to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 20 September 2001, Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush: 2001, 2 volumes, Book II: July 1 to December 31, 2001 (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 2003), p. 1142.Google Scholar
2.President George W. Bush, Press Conference, 13 April 2004, http://www.whitehouse.gov.Google Scholar
3.Memorandum: Yoo, John C., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel to Timothy Flanigan, The Deputy Counsel to the President, Subject: The President's Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorists and Nations Supporting Them, 25 September 2001, in The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
4.Memorandum: Bybee, Jay S., Assistant Attorney General, to Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Subject: Status of Taliban Forces under Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention, 7 February 2002, in The Torture Papers, p. 142.Google Scholar
5.Memorandum, Draft, Yoo, John, Deputy Attorney General, to William J. Haynes II, General Counsel of the Department of Defense, Subject: Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees, 9 January 2002, in The Torture Papers, p. 39.Google Scholar
6.Memorandum, , Bybee, Jay S. to Gonzales, Alberto R., Counsel to the President, and William J. Haynes, General Counsel of the Department of Defense, Subject: Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees, 22 January 2002 printed in The Torture Papers, p. 111.Google Scholar
7.Van Evera, Stephen, The Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 191–192.Google Scholar
8.Van Evera, , pp. 182–183.Google Scholar
9.President Bush's Interview with Diane Sawyer, 16 December 2003, http://www.abc.org.Google Scholar
10.Canetti, Elias, Crowds and Power (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984), p. 73.Google Scholar
11.Thayer, Bradley A., Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2004), pp. 77–78, 243–274.Google Scholar
12.Title 18, Sections 1340–1340A, http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C113C.txtGoogle Scholar
13.Memorandum, , Bybee, Jay S., Assistant Attorney General to Alberto R. Gonzales, Subject: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340–2340A, 1 August 2002, in The Torture Papers, pp. 172–217, at pp. 200, 203.Google Scholar
14.Memorandum, Draft, Gonzales, Albert R. to the President, Subject: Decision re Application of the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War to the Conflict with al Qaeda and the Taliban, 25 January 2002, printed in: The Torture Papers, p. 118–121.Google Scholar
15.Memorandum, Draft, Gonzales, Albert R.to the President, Subject: Decision re Application of the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War to the Conflict with al Qaeda and the Taliban, 25 January 2002, in The Torture Papers, p. 118–121.Google Scholar
16.Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment (CAT), http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.Google Scholar
17.Title 18, Sections 1340–1340A.Google Scholar
18.Geneva Convention III, Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, and Geneva Convention IV, Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 August 1949, in The Law of War: A Documentary History, 2 volumes, Friedman, Leon, editor (New York: Random House, 1972), Volume I, pp. 589–691.Google Scholar
19.PresidentMemorandum, Bush, George W.to the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Chief of Staff to the President, the Director of Central Intelligence, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Subject: Humane Treatment of al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees, 7 February 2002, in The Torture Papers, p. 135.Google Scholar
20.Memorandum, , Secretary of State Colin L. Powell to the Counsel for the President and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, Subject: Draft Decision Memorandum for the President on the Applicability of the Geneva Convention to the Conflict in Afghanistan inThe Torture Papers, pp. 122–125.Google Scholar
21.Memorandum, , William H. Taft IV, the Legal Adviser of the Department of State to the Counsel to the President, Subject: Comments on Your Paper on the Geneva Convention, 2 February 2002, in The Torture Papers, p. 129.Google Scholar
22.CAT.Google Scholar
23.Memorandum, , Bybee, J. S., Office of Legal Counsel, to Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Subject Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340–2340A, in The Torture Papers, pp. 172–217, at pp. 213–214.Google Scholar
24.Report of two committees of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York: the Committee on International Human Rights and the Committee on Military Affairs and Justice, April 2004, in The Torture Papers, pp. 557–611.Google Scholar
25.MG Geoffrey Miller's Report: Assessment of DOD Counterterrorism Interrogation and Detention Operations in Iraq, September 2003. The report is printed as an annex to the Tabuga Report, in The Torture Papers, pp. 451–450, at p. 451.Google Scholar
26.The Taguba Report: Article 15–6: Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade, March 2004, in The Torture Papers, pp. 405–465.Google Scholar
27.Independent Panel to Review Department of Defense Detention Operations: the Final Report of the Independent Panel to Review DOD Detention Operations [the Schlesinger Report], August 2004, in The Torture Papers, pp. 908–975, at p. 915.Google Scholar
28.Lieutenant General Sanchez, Headquarters, Combined Joint Task Force Seven to Commander, US Central Command, Subject: JTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy, 14 September 2003, as declassified under a Freedom of Information request by the American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
29.Lieutenant General Sanchez, Headquarters, Combined Joint Task Force Seven to Commander, US Central Command, Subject: JTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy, 12 October 2003, as declassified under a Freedom of Information request by the American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
30.LTC Diane El Beaver, Staff Judge Advocate, to Commander, Joint Task Force 170, Subject: Legal Brief on Proposed Counter-Resistance Strategies, 11 October 2002, in The Torture Papers, pp. 229–235, at pp. 234–235.Google Scholar
31.Memorandum, , Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to the Commander, U.S. Southern Command, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques in the War on Terrorism, 16 April 2003, in The Torture Papers, 360–365.Google Scholar
32.Lieutenant General Sanchez, Headquarters, Combined Joint Task Force Seven to Commander, US Central Command, Subject: JTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy, 14 September 2003, as declassified under a Freedom of Information request by the American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
33.Lieutenant General Sanchez, Headquarters, Combined Joint Task Force Seven to Commander, US Central Command, Subject: JTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy, 12 October 2003, as declassified under a Freedom of Information request by the American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
34.Herbert, Bob, “From ‘Gook’ to ‘Raghead,”’ The New York Times, 2 May 2005.Google Scholar
35.PresidentBush's, George W.Second Inaugural, 20 January 2005, http:www.washingtonpost.com.Google Scholar
36.Thayer, , pp. 157–159.Google Scholar
37.Wright, Quincy, A Study of War (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, 1965), pp. 347, 895–922, 991–999, 1004–1009.Google Scholar
38.Thayer, , pp. 224–227.Google Scholar
39.Glover, Jonathan, Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), p. 195.Google Scholar
40.Glover, , pp. 221–222.Google Scholar
41.Seabury, PaulCordevilla, Angelo, War: Ends and Means (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 220.Google Scholar
42.Bacevich, Andrew J., The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 92–93.Google Scholar