Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:03:05.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Theology and the Dialectics of (Counter)Secularization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Renaud Fabbri
Renaud Fabbri*
Affiliation:
VIP Research Center, University of Versailles
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Renaud Fabbri, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, Suite 2100, Harris Building, Washington, DC 20007-2401. E-mail: renaudfabbri@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on Habermas's hypothesis of a post-secular world society and on Voegelin's philosophy of consciousness. It first analyzes the genesis of the post-secular hypothesis in the work of Habermas. It then looks at the historical roots of the post-secular world society since the Axial Age. Finally, it delineates the evolution of religious actors in modern societies, at the political and cognitive levels, focusing on the European Counter-revolutionaries, the Islamist and post-Islamist movements of the Middle East, and the Hindu Nationalists. The article concludes that Habermas's hypothesis provides a plausible alternative to neo-Schmittian theory of the Clash of Civilizations proposed by Huntington.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 730 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badie, Bertrand. 1992. L'Etat importé (The Imported State). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 2010. “Confronting Modernity.” Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, eds. Michael, Warner, Vanatewerpen, Jonathan, and Cakhoun, Craign. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. 1985. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1991. Essais sur l'individualisme (Essays on Individualism). Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129:1–29.Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah. 2008. The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. 1985. Le désenchantement du monde (The Disenchantment of the World). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gershoni, James P. 2009. Confronting Fascism in Egypt: Dictatorship versus Democracy in the 1930s. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghose, Aurobindo. 1971. The Human Cycle, the Ideal of Human Unity, War and Self-determination. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2011. “‘The Political’: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. “Notes on Post-Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essay. New York, NY: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, and Ratzinger, Joseph. 2006. The Dialectics of Secularization. San Francisco, CA: Ignatus Press.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Muhammad. 1999. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Chicago, IL: Kazi Publications.Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 1998. The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. 1948. “The Axial age of Human History: A Base for the Unity of Mankind.” Commentary 6:430–435.Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki. 1998. “The New Religious Politics: Where, When, and Why Do ‘Fundamentalisms’ Appear?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40:696–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, Jean-Claude. 2007. Sécularisation et laicité (Secularization and Secularism). Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Monod, Jean-Claude. 2002. La querelle de la secularisation (The Quarrel of Secularization). Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Nanda, Meera. 2003. Prophets Facing Backward. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ramadan, Tariq. 2008. Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2006. Political Theology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Soroush, Abdelkarim. 2002. Reason, Freedom and Democracy in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1974. The Ecumenic Age. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1952. The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar