Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:15:59.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quotas as Opportunities and Obstacles: Revisiting Gender Quotas in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2019

Brian Turnbull Open the ORCID record for Brian Turnbull [Opens in a new window]
Brian Turnbull*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida – Sarasota-Manatee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the empirical uncertainty regarding whether gender quotas establish a foundation of political representation and experience that encourages female candidates to compete against men. It updates and expands existing empirical research by contributing an analysis of the most recent electoral data across four municipal corporations in India over two election cycles. Critical questions on the theoretical expectation that gender quotas should encourage and enable women politicians to compete in open-gender contests over time are considered. The Indian quota system has not encouraged women to broadly compete outside the quota at the local level but has made some wards more likely to elect women. Parties also continue to resist nominating women outside the quota but are more likely to do so in wards previously represented by a woman. Finally, the unique overlap of gender and community quotas can discourage incumbency by essentially blocking incumbents from running again in their ward due to shifting community requirements.

Keywords

Gender and politicsgender quotasgender reservationscaste reservationsIndiarepresentation and electoral systems
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 324 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Brian Turnbull currently teaches comparative politics at the University of South Florida. His research focuses on the politics of under-represented groups in South Asia, contributing to our understanding of the interaction between gender and electoral institutions. He received his PhD in political science from the University of Kansas in 2018, and an MA in security studies from Georgetown University in 2011.

References

REFERENCES

Agarwal, Bina. 1994. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anitha, S., Bharadwaj, Reshma, Jayakumari, D., Krishnan, Ranjini, Nisha, P.R., Praveena, K. P., et al. 2008. Gendering Governance or Governing Women? Politics, Patriarchy, and Democratic Decentralisation in Kerala State, India. Thiruvananthapuram, India: Centre for Development Studies.Google Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalotra, Sonia, Clots-Figueras, Irma, and Iyer, Lakshmi. 2018. “Pathbreakers? Women's Electoral Success and Future Political Participation.” Economic Journal 128 (613): 1844–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. “Do Electoral Quotas Work After They Are Withdrawn? Evidence From a Natural Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2000. “The Transformation of Ethnic Politics in India: The Decline of Congress and the Rise of the Bahujan Samaj Party in Hoshiarpur.” Journal of Asian Studies 59 (1): 26–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chathukulam, Jos, and John, M. S.. 2000. “Empowerment of Women Panchayat Members: Learning From Kerala (India).” Asian Journal of Women's Studies 6 (4): 66–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauchard, Simon. 2014. “Can Descriptive Representation Change Beliefs About a Stigmatized Group? Evidence From Rural India.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep K. 2001. Democracy Without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Coate, Stephen, and Loury, Glen C.. 1993. “Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes?” American Economic Review 83 (5): 1220–1240.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2010. “Judging Gender Quotas: Predictions and Results.” Policy & Politics 38 (3): 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, Klaus, Jin, Songqing, Nagarajan, Hari K., and Fang, Xia. 2011. Does Female Reservation Affect Long-Term Political Outcomes? Evidence from Rural India. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Tim, and Moore, Mick. 1983. “On Kinship Structure, Female Autonomy, and Demographic Behavior in India.” Population and Development Review 9 (1): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Archana. 2001. “Women's Reservations and Electoral Politics in Urban Local Bodies: an Analysis of Chennai Municipal Corporation Elections, 2001.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 10 (1): 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOI (Government of India). 1981. Backward Classes Commission (B. P. Mandal, Chairman). Report of the Backward Classes Commission, First Part (Volumes I and II). New Delhi: Controller of Publications.Google Scholar
Hansson, F. 2007. “Constitution-Making Explanations to Gender Quotas: A Case Study of the Introduction of Reserved Seats for Women in the Rwandan Parliament.” Master's thesis, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. 2016. “Competing Inequalities? On the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Candidate Nominations in Indian Elections.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. 2017. Social Justice Through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. 2018. “India—Contradictory Record.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Women's Political Rights, eds. Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L., and Tan, N., 673–688. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2004. “Quota Legislation and the Election of Women: Learning from the Costa Rican Experience.” Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1203–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishwar, Madhu. 1996. “Women and Politics: Beyond Quotas.” Economic and Political Weekly 31 (43): 2867–2874.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Santosh, and Prakash, Nishith. 2012. “Political Decentralization, Women's Reservation and Child Health Outcomes: A Case Study of Rural Bihar.” Working papers 2012–2018, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Linden, Leigh. L. 2004. “Are Incumbents Really Advantaged? The Preference for Non-incumbents in Indian National Elections.” http://www.leighlinden.com/Incumbency%20Disad.pdf. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. P., and Saxena, R.. 2003. India at the Polls: Parliamentary Elections in the Federal Phase. Hyderabad, India: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Tripp, A. M., Konaté, D., and Lowe-Morna, C.. 2006. “Sub-Saharan Africa: On the Fast Track to Women's Political Representation.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude, 112–137. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Brian. 2018. “Women Who Only Serve Chai: Gender Reservations and Autonomy in India.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2116572179?accountid=14745.Google Scholar
Uppal, Yogesh. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138 (1–2): 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Turnbull supplementary material

Online Appendix Tables

Download Turnbull supplementary material(File)
File 24.6 KB